Recommendations & Conclusions
38 items
1
Recommendation
Second Report - Never Again: The UK’s R…
Rejected
The Government should accept Parliament’s view that Uyghurs and other ethnic minority groups in Xinjiang are suffering genocide and crimes against humanity, and take action to bring these crimes to an end.
Government response AI summary
The government rejects the recommendation to accept Parliament's view on genocide, reiterating its long-standing policy not to make such determinations, which it believes should be decided by a credible judicial process. However, it agrees there is compelling evidence of widespread human rights violations and commits …
Read full response →
Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
2
Recommendation
Second Report - Never Again: The UK’s R…
Not Addressed
The UK should call directly for the immediate disbandment of the internment camp system in Xinjiang, the cessation of forced sterilisation of women and separation of children, and an end to mass forced labour programmes such as Xinjiang Aid.
Government response AI summary
The government's response refers to a combined response for Recommendations 2, 3, and 4, which is not provided in this item.
Read full response →
Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
3
Recommendation
Second Report - Never Again: The UK’s R…
Not Addressed
The UK Government should increase pressure on the Chinese government to allow international observers access to Xinjiang, especially the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. The Government should use every opportunity it has at UN organs, summits, and treaty bodies to raise the issue. To do this, the UK …
Read more
The UK Government should increase pressure on the Chinese government to allow international observers access to Xinjiang, especially the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. The Government should use every opportunity it has at UN organs, summits, and treaty bodies to raise the issue. To do this, the UK should engage more closely with partners and those nations not currently taking action to ensure support on UN votes and statements.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government response refers to a combined response for recommendations 2, 3 and 4, which is not provided, thus the specific recommendation for increasing pressure and engagement for observer access to Xinjiang is not addressed in this text.
Read full response →
Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
4
Recommendation
Second Report - Never Again: The UK’s R…
Accepted
If the Chinese government continues to stall and prevent in-country investigations, the UK should propose a Human Rights Council motion that the High Commissioner for Human Rights conduct an investigation into the atrocities in Xinjiang from outside of China. The Government should also explore the prospect of a Human Rights …
Read more
If the Chinese government continues to stall and prevent in-country investigations, the UK should propose a Human Rights Council motion that the High Commissioner for Human Rights conduct an investigation into the atrocities in Xinjiang from outside of China. The Government should also explore the prospect of a Human Rights Council Commission of Inquiry.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government accepts the recommendation, noting its ongoing efforts to pressure China for access and welcomes the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights' plans to finalise and publish an assessment of available information on atrocities in Xinjiang by the end of the year, which aligns …
Read full response →
Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
5
Recommendation
Second Report - Never Again: The UK’s R…
Rejected
The Convention on the Elimination of all forms of Racial Discrimination provides a viable avenue through which the UK Government, with others, may hold the Chinese government accountable, and another forum through which likeminded countries can draw attention to and pursue accountability for human rights abuses in Xinjiang We recommend …
Read more
The Convention on the Elimination of all forms of Racial Discrimination provides a viable avenue through which the UK Government, with others, may hold the Chinese government accountable, and another forum through which likeminded countries can draw attention to and pursue accountability for human rights abuses in Xinjiang We recommend that the Government urgently raise a complaint against China to the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government rejects raising a bilateral complaint against China to CERD, arguing it would not increase scrutiny and would risk turning a global issue into a bilateral dispute, contrary to their strategy of concerted international pressure.
Read full response →
Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
6
Recommendation
Second Report - Never Again: The UK’s R…
Rejected
We recommend that the UK moves for special sessions of the United Nations General Assembly and the United Nations Human Rights Council to find solutions to the crisis in Xinjiang.
Government response AI summary
The government rejects the recommendation, stating that it does not currently believe there is sufficient support to successfully move for special sessions at the UN.
Read full response →
Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
7
Recommendation
Second Report - Never Again: The UK’s R…
Rejected
We recommend that the Government engages in dialogue with the International Criminal Court about the feasibility of a proprio motu investigation into crimes committed against the Uyghurs in Xinjiang and beyond.
Government response AI summary
The government rejects the recommendation, stating that decisions on proprio motu investigations lie with the independent ICC Prosecutor, and that the ICC's jurisdiction is limited as the alleged crimes are occurring in a non-State Party territory.
Read full response →
Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
8
Recommendation
Second Report - Never Again: The UK’s R…
Accepted in Part
The collection and preservation of evidence will be essential for future accountability for these crimes. We recommend that the Government allocate funding for the creation of an international mechanism for collecting evidence on the crimes in Xinjiang, and provides further resources to help locate and record the details of those …
Read more
The collection and preservation of evidence will be essential for future accountability for these crimes. We recommend that the Government allocate funding for the creation of an international mechanism for collecting evidence on the crimes in Xinjiang, and provides further resources to help locate and record the details of those who have gone missing under the Chinese Communist Party’s internment system so that they do not remain nameless victims.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government accepts in part, committing to continue funding independent research to collect evidence of human rights violations in Xinjiang. However, it defers allocating funding for an international mechanism until such a UN mechanism is established, citing the need for a resolution, and does not …
Read full response →
Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
9
Recommendation
Second Report - Never Again: The UK’s R…
Accepted
The ‘D10’ model of democratic countries is a good starting point for coalition- building but cannot be the limit—significant diplomatic efforts should also be Never Again: The UK’s Responsibility to Act on Atrocities in Xinjiang and Beyond 27 focused on states in Africa, South America, Asia, the Middle East, and …
Read more
The ‘D10’ model of democratic countries is a good starting point for coalition- building but cannot be the limit—significant diplomatic efforts should also be Never Again: The UK’s Responsibility to Act on Atrocities in Xinjiang and Beyond 27 focused on states in Africa, South America, Asia, the Middle East, and Eastern Europe. The Government should lead efforts to create a more consistent coalition of democratic countries to coordinate action on Xinjiang through the UN and other institutions.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government accepts the recommendation, detailing its ongoing and past diplomatic efforts to build broad international coalitions, including leading UN joint statements, coordinating asset freezes with 29 other countries, and using its G7 Presidency to address the situation in Xinjiang.
Read full response →
Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
10
Recommendation
Second Report - Never Again: The UK’s R…
Accepted
We recommend that the Government commits financial and bureaucratic resources to ensuring future Build Back Better World projects meet all internationally recognised standards, including on labour rights, environmental measures, and transparency.
Government response AI summary
The government accepts the recommendation, committing to strong environmental, social, financial, labour, governance, and transparency standards at the heart of its G7 partnership approach, building on agreed multilateral standards for quality infrastructure.
Read full response →
Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
11
Recommendation
Second Report - Never Again: The UK’s R…
Deferred
If the British Olympic Association and competing teams decide not to boycott the 2022 Beijing Winter Olympics, the Government should not attend and should urge others not to do so. The Government should suggest the British Olympic Association does not participate in the opening or closing ceremonies, beyond one representative …
Read more
If the British Olympic Association and competing teams decide not to boycott the 2022 Beijing Winter Olympics, the Government should not attend and should urge others not to do so. The Government should suggest the British Olympic Association does not participate in the opening or closing ceremonies, beyond one representative carrying the Union Flag. It should abstain from sending government officials to any ceremonies or functions, strongly discourage UK businesses from sponsoring or advertising at the Olympics, encourage fans and tourists to stay away, and discourage athletes from supporting or accepting the Chinese government’s propaganda efforts while in-country.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government states it has not made decisions regarding its representation at the 2022 Beijing Winter Olympics, clarifying that Team GB's participation is a matter for the independent British Olympic and Paralympic Associations, not the government.
Read full response →
Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
12
Recommendation
Second Report - Never Again: The UK’s R…
Accepted
For sanctions to be effective, they must be used in full coordination with allies and against those with whom ultimate responsibility for the Xinjiang atrocities lies. We recommend that the Government intensify efforts to coordinate sanctions with allies to consistently sanction senior individuals and entities with the most responsibility for …
Read more
For sanctions to be effective, they must be used in full coordination with allies and against those with whom ultimate responsibility for the Xinjiang atrocities lies. We recommend that the Government intensify efforts to coordinate sanctions with allies to consistently sanction senior individuals and entities with the most responsibility for or connection to abuses in Xinjiang.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government highlights its past coordinated sanctions with allies against Chinese officials and entities for abuses in Xinjiang, and commits to continuing to keep potential listings under review and working closely with allies on future action.
Read full response →
Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
13
Recommendation
Second Report - Never Again: The UK’s R…
Accepted in Part
The UK Government should push for an urgent, independent review of UNESCO’s investigatory powers and processes, and formally request that the organisation pursue its mandate with determination and commitment. The UK should adopt a policy of coordinating with allies to block and reduce the influence of the worst human rights- …
Read more
The UK Government should push for an urgent, independent review of UNESCO’s investigatory powers and processes, and formally request that the organisation pursue its mandate with determination and commitment. The UK should adopt a policy of coordinating with allies to block and reduce the influence of the worst human rights- abusing countries on the UNESCO World Heritage Committee. (Paragraph 31) Diaspora and culture
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government agrees that UNESCO should be aware of the situation and commits to raising its concerns with UNESCO partners, but implicitly rejects pushing for an urgent independent review of UNESCO's powers or coordinating to block countries, citing UNESCO's limited mandate.
Read full response →
Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
14
Recommendation
Second Report - Never Again: The UK’s R…
Accepted
The Government should conduct an urgent consultation with members of these communities in the UK to determine the extent of harassment they are facing and the type of support they require, offering support and protection as appropriate.
Government response AI summary
The government accepts the recommendation, committing to conduct further consultation with the Uyghur community to understand their challenges and use findings to inform government policy.
Read full response →
Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
15
Recommendation
Second Report - Never Again: The UK’s R…
Rejected
We recommend that the Government implement an asylum fast track for Uyghurs and members of other minority ethnic groups who are fleeing persecution in China.
Government response AI summary
The government rejects the recommendation, stating it does not plan to implement a specific asylum fast track for Uyghurs, but ensures all asylum claims are considered on individual merits and in accordance with international obligations.
Read full response →
Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
16
Recommendation
Second Report - Never Again: The UK’s R…
Rejected
The UK should form a coalition of ‘sanctuary states’ that will publicly recommit to the principles of non-refoulement. Doing so will signal to members of persecuted minority groups such as the Uyghurs that they will be safe in these countries, and it will apply further diplomatic and reputational pressure on …
Read more
The UK should form a coalition of ‘sanctuary states’ that will publicly recommit to the principles of non-refoulement. Doing so will signal to members of persecuted minority groups such as the Uyghurs that they will be safe in these countries, and it will apply further diplomatic and reputational pressure on those states guilty of deporting Uyghurs to China. (Paragraph 36) 28 Never Again: The UK’s Responsibility to Act on Atrocities in Xinjiang and Beyond
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government rejects forming a 'coalition of sanctuary states', stating they will continue to intervene through diplomatic channels and other tools with international partners to prevent deportations, believing this action is most effective.
Read full response →
Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
17
Recommendation
Second Report - Never Again: The UK’s R…
Rejected
We recommend that, where there is credible evidence of a state party to the United Nations Convention against Torture deporting Uyghurs and members of other persecuted minority groups to China, the UK should raise a complaint against that state to the Committee against Torture.
Read more
We recommend that, where there is credible evidence of a state party to the United Nations Convention against Torture deporting Uyghurs and members of other persecuted minority groups to China, the UK should raise a complaint against that state to the Committee against Torture.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government rejects the recommendation to raise a bilateral complaint against states deporting Uyghurs to China under the UN Convention against Torture, stating that such action is more effective when conducted in concert with international partners.
Read full response →
Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
18
Recommendation
Second Report - Never Again: The UK’s R…
Rejected
The British Council should prioritise cultural protection funding for the preservation and promotion of Uyghur tangible and intangible cultural heritage. The BBC World Service should broadcast in Uyghur in areas where substantial Uyghur communities live. (Paragraph 38) Forced labour and the private sector
Read more
The British Council should prioritise cultural protection funding for the preservation and promotion of Uyghur tangible and intangible cultural heritage. The BBC World Service should broadcast in Uyghur in areas where substantial Uyghur communities live. (Paragraph 38) Forced labour and the private sector
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government rejects the recommendation. It states that extending the British Council's Cultural Protection Fund to Xinjiang is not currently feasible due to scope restrictions, funding requirements, and logistical challenges. It also states that the provision of an additional Uyghur broadcast service is for the …
Read full response →
Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
19
Recommendation
Second Report - Never Again: The UK’s R…
Accepted
In its response to this report, we ask that the Government inform us of when the Department for International Trade will share the export review’s findings and actions with Parliament.
Government response AI summary
The government accepts the recommendation, committing that the Department for International Trade will report back to Parliament at the conclusion of its urgent review of export controls as they apply to Xinjiang.
Read full response →
Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
20
Recommendation
Second Report - Never Again: The UK’s R…
Acknowledged
As well as imposing punitive fines for non-compliance with the reporting elements of the Modern Slavery Act 2015, we recommend that the Government introduce new legislation that will create a legal requirement for businesses and public sector bodies to take concrete measures to prevent and remove the use of forced …
Read more
As well as imposing punitive fines for non-compliance with the reporting elements of the Modern Slavery Act 2015, we recommend that the Government introduce new legislation that will create a legal requirement for businesses and public sector bodies to take concrete measures to prevent and remove the use of forced labour in their value chains. This new duty should be backed up by meaningful sanctions and penalties for non-compliance.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government will continue to keep its policy on due diligence under review and would need to be persuaded that new mandated supply chain due diligence legislation would be practical and proportionate.
Read full response →
Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
21
Recommendation
Second Report - Never Again: The UK’s R…
Rejected
We recommend that the Government review the £36m threshold for businesses to be required to produce Modern Slavery Statements, with a view to reducing it.
Government response AI summary
The government rejects reducing the Modern Slavery Statement threshold, citing a September 2020 review that determined the current £36m threshold remained appropriate and stating they have no plans to change it.
Read full response →
Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
22
Recommendation
Second Report - Never Again: The UK’s R…
Accepted in Part
Trade commissioners, envoys, and officers should be equipped with regularly updated toolkits and training to ensure they are fully informed of the forced labour risk associated with the countries in which they are working. This should be supported by a public Government-led grading system of countries’ adherence to global labour …
Read more
Trade commissioners, envoys, and officers should be equipped with regularly updated toolkits and training to ensure they are fully informed of the forced labour risk associated with the countries in which they are working. This should be supported by a public Government-led grading system of countries’ adherence to global labour standards as set by institutions like the International Labour Organization.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government accepts the recommendation to provide a one-day training course on forced labour for Trade Envoys and officials, but rejects the proposal for a government-led grading system, stating this role is best for specialist organisations.
Read full response →
Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
23
Recommendation
Second Report - Never Again: The UK’s R…
Rejected
The Government should explore the possibility of banning the import of all cotton products known to be produced in whole or in part in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region of China, in line with WTO rules. While we primarily heard evidence on the cotton industry, we believe this ban should …
Read more
The Government should explore the possibility of banning the import of all cotton products known to be produced in whole or in part in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region of China, in line with WTO rules. While we primarily heard evidence on the cotton industry, we believe this ban should be extended to other industries.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government explicitly states it does not have plans to place import controls on goods from China, thus rejecting the recommendation for a ban, though it highlights other measures taken to tackle forced labour.
Read full response →
Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
24
Recommendation
Second Report - Never Again: The UK’s R…
Rejected
The Government should issue guidance to business to implement modern means of traceability and product origin verification as part of their due diligence measures.
Government response AI summary
The government acknowledges the role of technology and is engaging with businesses and has existing guidance, but explicitly states it does not currently plan to issue further specific guidance on modern means of traceability and product origin verification.
Read full response →
Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
25
Recommendation
Second Report - Never Again: The UK’s R…
Accepted
The Government should share Post-level intelligence on specific risk areas and factors with UK companies operating in China when appropriate to do so, to ensure it contributes to and supports private sector due diligence within the country.
Government response AI summary
The government accepts the recommendation, stating it already provides detailed guidance to UK companies operating in China, drawing on information from its overseas network, and commits to keeping this guidance updated.
Read full response →
Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
26
Recommendation
Second Report - Never Again: The UK’s R…
Accepted
The Government should use information gained from local sources, Posts, and civil society to identify specific factories and companies that make use of forced labour and prohibit them from importing to the UK through the sanctions regime. (Paragraph 51) Never Again: The UK’s Responsibility to Act on Atrocities in Xinjiang …
Read more
The Government should use information gained from local sources, Posts, and civil society to identify specific factories and companies that make use of forced labour and prohibit them from importing to the UK through the sanctions regime. (Paragraph 51) Never Again: The UK’s Responsibility to Act on Atrocities in Xinjiang and Beyond 29
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government highlights existing measures and previously announced actions, including some sanctions and supply chain due diligence, as their approach to tackling forced labour and does not commit to a new process of identifying specific factories for import bans via sanctions.
Read full response →
Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
27
Recommendation
Second Report - Never Again: The UK’s R…
Accepted
The UK should press for the International Labour Organization to conduct a full investigation of the Xinjiang region in order to verify the extent of forced labour there as a matter of urgent priority. (Paragraph 52) Technology and research
Government response AI summary
The government accepts the recommendation, noting they have already made a joint statement to the ILO to investigate forced labour in Xinjiang and will continue to press the ILO on this priority.
Read full response →
Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
28
Recommendation
Second Report - Never Again: The UK’s R…
Accepted
Where a Chinese institution possesses known or suspected links to repression in Xinjiang, or substantial connections to Chinese military research, UK universities should avoid any form of technological or research collaboration with them. They should also conduct urgent reviews of their current research partnerships, terminating them where involved parties are …
Read more
Where a Chinese institution possesses known or suspected links to repression in Xinjiang, or substantial connections to Chinese military research, UK universities should avoid any form of technological or research collaboration with them. They should also conduct urgent reviews of their current research partnerships, terminating them where involved parties are found or suspected to be complicit in the atrocities in Xinjiang.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government details a range of existing measures and support mechanisms already in place to help universities manage risks and make informed decisions regarding international research collaborations, including new guidance, export controls, and a new advice team. It commits to keeping this support under review, …
Read full response →
Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
29
Recommendation
Second Report - Never Again: The UK’s R…
Accepted
We recommend that the Government fund and manage the creation of a regularly- updated due diligence and intelligence database to provide universities with a directory of Chinese institutions and companies that possess strong or suspected connections to technology-aided human rights abuses. The FCDO should convene a panel to oversee and …
Read more
We recommend that the Government fund and manage the creation of a regularly- updated due diligence and intelligence database to provide universities with a directory of Chinese institutions and companies that possess strong or suspected connections to technology-aided human rights abuses. The FCDO should convene a panel to oversee and discuss due diligence, to include government officials and members of the academic community. This panel should use all means available to exert public pressure on institutions, ensuring compliance.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government does not commit to funding a new due diligence database or convening a new panel, stating that existing security guidelines published by Universities UK, which advise universities on risk management and due diligence, are currently judged appropriate. They will continue to keep their …
Read full response →
Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
30
Recommendation
Second Report - Never Again: The UK’s R…
Accepted in Part
Equipment manufactured by companies such as Hikvision and Dahua should not be permitted to operate within the UK. We recommend that the Government prohibits organisations and individuals in the UK from doing business with any companies known to be associated with the Xinjiang atrocities through the sanctions regime. The Government …
Read more
Equipment manufactured by companies such as Hikvision and Dahua should not be permitted to operate within the UK. We recommend that the Government prohibits organisations and individuals in the UK from doing business with any companies known to be associated with the Xinjiang atrocities through the sanctions regime. The Government should prohibit UK firms and public sector bodies from conducting business with, investing in, or entering into partnerships with such Chinese firms, to ensure that UK companies do not provide either blueprints or financing for further technology-enabled human rights abuses. (Paragraph 59) The UK’s approach to atrocity prevention
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government has not committed to a general prohibition on all UK firms and individuals doing business with implicated companies. However, it has published guidance for UK firms, is introducing new guidance for public sector bodies to exclude suppliers linked to human rights violations, and …
Read full response →
Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
31
Recommendation
Second Report - Never Again: The UK’s R…
Rejected
We recommend that the Government introduce a national, cross-departmental strategy for atrocity prevention.
Government response AI summary
The government rejects the recommendation for a national, cross-departmental strategy for atrocity prevention, stating that individual FCDO departments are best placed to tackle risks regionally.
Read full response →
Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
32
Recommendation
Second Report - Never Again: The UK’s R…
Not Addressed
While the FCDO is the lead department for mass atrocity prevention, we recommend that the Government issue clear guidance and training to all relevant departments about their specific responsibilities for mass atrocity prevention. The departments involved should have senior staff members designated as atrocity prevention leads. The newly announced Conflict …
Read more
While the FCDO is the lead department for mass atrocity prevention, we recommend that the Government issue clear guidance and training to all relevant departments about their specific responsibilities for mass atrocity prevention. The departments involved should have senior staff members designated as atrocity prevention leads. The newly announced Conflict Centre should coordinate these departmental leads and ensure it offers departments access to experts in international law, sanctions, multilateral coordination, intelligence, aid programming, and so on.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government's response text refers to a combined response located elsewhere, thus not addressing the specific recommendation within this provided text.
Read full response →
Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
33
Recommendation
Second Report - Never Again: The UK’s R…
Accepted in Part
The Government should provide atrocity prevention ‘toolkits’ and atrocity prevention training for FCDO staff, with a mandatory refresher course every three years for all staff in diplomatic, programming, or policy-related roles.
Government response AI summary
The government has developed a dedicated atrocity prevention training module for all FCDO staff and provides guidance material, committing to continuously look for further opportunities to enhance this offer. However, it does not specifically commit to mandatory refresher courses or the creation of explicit 'toolkits'.
Read full response →
Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
34
Recommendation
Second Report - Never Again: The UK’s R…
Acknowledged
The Government should implement additional early warning tools specifically focused on predicting mass atrocities, and mainstream non-conflict atrocity prevention 30 Never Again: The UK’s Responsibility to Act on Atrocities in Xinjiang and Beyond thinking in the newly announced Conflict Centre. The Conflict Centre should be renamed to the Conflict and …
Read more
The Government should implement additional early warning tools specifically focused on predicting mass atrocities, and mainstream non-conflict atrocity prevention 30 Never Again: The UK’s Responsibility to Act on Atrocities in Xinjiang and Beyond thinking in the newly announced Conflict Centre. The Conflict Centre should be renamed to the Conflict and Atrocity Prevention Centre, to ensure atrocity prevention thinking is prioritised in its operations.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government agrees on the importance of early warning tools, describes existing mechanisms, and states the FCDO is exploring better use of data and technology, but does not commit to implementing specific additional tools or renaming the Conflict Centre.
Read full response →
Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
35
Recommendation
Second Report - Never Again: The UK’s R…
Rejected
We recommend that the Government appoint a Special Envoy on Atrocity Prevention to ensure that the prevention of mass atrocities is consistently championed in Parliament and Government.
Government response AI summary
The government rejects the recommendation to appoint a Special Envoy on Atrocity Prevention, stating that Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon already oversees relevant government policy and is well-placed for this work.
Read full response →
Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
36
Recommendation
Second Report - Never Again: The UK’s R…
Accepted
The Government should commit to funding further such research, which is doing vital work to expose those injustices which the Communist Party of China is eager to hide. (Paragraph 66) Conclusion
Government response AI summary
The government explicitly accepts the recommendation and commits to funding further valuable research on the human rights situation in Xinjiang.
Read full response →
Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
37
Conclusion
Second Report - Never Again: The UK’s R…
In a wider context, when in 2001 the People’s Republic of China was accepted into the World Trade Organization (following its admission to the UN Security Council in 1971 and the recognition of its national Olympic Committee by the IOC in 1979) it was expected that this would lead to …
Read more
In a wider context, when in 2001 the People’s Republic of China was accepted into the World Trade Organization (following its admission to the UN Security Council in 1971 and the recognition of its national Olympic Committee by the IOC in 1979) it was expected that this would lead to less repression within China and a general improvement in international relations. It has not. In recent years, the Chinese government has tested and challenged the way we trade and engage with each other to breaking point, undermining the fundamental principles that have ensured peace and stability, and which were written by those envoys from the states that had so suffered in the Second World War, including China. It is incumbent on all countries and governments that support this system to find innovative ways of working together to hold powerful nations to account for their actions. Xinjiang is one example of what happens when states are allowed to act with impunity. We must ensure that this does not set a dangerous precedent.
Show less
Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
38
Conclusion
Second Report - Never Again: The UK’s R…
Accepted
While we commend the ongoing work of the UK Government in speaking out and leading on the issue of Xinjiang at the United Nations, we are concerned that its actions do not match its rhetoric and have so far proved ineffective. A crisis of this scale requires a cross-government, cross-sectoral, …
Read more
While we commend the ongoing work of the UK Government in speaking out and leading on the issue of Xinjiang at the United Nations, we are concerned that its actions do not match its rhetoric and have so far proved ineffective. A crisis of this scale requires a cross-government, cross-sectoral, international approach. In this report, we have made recommendations on multilateral action, private sector reforms, the support required for members of persecuted diaspora, and the Government’s approach to atrocity prevention. The implementation of these recommendations would provide a much more robust and comprehensive Government response to the Xinjiang crisis, ensuring that all support possible is given to the people suffering from identity-based persecution. (Paragraph 68) Never Again: The UK’s Responsibility to Act on Atrocities in Xinjiang and Beyond 31
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government acknowledges the report's concerns and the need for further action, outlining a range of robust actions already undertaken, including leading UN statements, imposing sanctions, and raising concerns with China. They state they have addressed each of the Committee's 36 recommendations in full.
Read full response →
Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office