Select Committee · Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee

Food Security

Status: Closed Opened: 25 Jul 2022 Closed: 17 Nov 2023 15 recommendations 8 conclusions 1 report

This inquiry is looking at the pressures facing the UK food supply chain and its implication of UK food security and public access to access healthy and nutritious food. You can read the terms of reference for this inquiry here . Our call for evidence ended on 30 September 2022

Clear

Reports

1 report
Title HC No. Published Items Response
Seventh Report - Food security HC 622 28 Jul 2023 23 Responded

Recommendations & Conclusions

15 items
3 Conclusion Seventh Report - Food security Deferred

Mandate the Prime Minister to chair an annual food security summit covering statutory aspects.

While we welcome the Prime Minister’s commitment to chair an annual food security summit, we are disappointed that this evolved into May’s “Farm to Fork Summit” in which, although successful, food security was not the focus. This was a missed opportunity for the Government to demonstrate its seriousness towards the …

Government response. The government references its National Food Strategy and policies from the Farm to Fork Summit as setting its priorities, and indicates it fully considered Henry Dimbleby’s review, but does not commit to the Prime Minister chairing a dedicated annual food …
4 Conclusion Seventh Report - Food security Deferred

Publish a fully updated annual UK Food Security Report with action and progress plans.

A fully updated edition of the UK Food Security Report should be published on an annual basis, and a month in advance of the annual food summit. This should be accompanied by an action plan for at least the next 12 months on the steps the Government will take to …

Government response. The government agrees on the need for policy coherence and strong leadership, and describes existing cross-Whitehall structures and departmental responsibilities for food supply and safety, but does not address the recommendation to publish an annual UK Food Security Report with …
5 Conclusion Seventh Report - Food security Deferred

Government Food Strategy inadequate, failing to respond fully to National Food Strategy recommendations.

The final report of the National Food Strategy independent review (NFSIR) offered not only a detailed and considered analysis of the challenges facing our food system, including food security, but also put forward achievable actions. In contrast, the Government Food Strategy (GFS) has fallen short. It is not, as the …

Government response. The government deflects the recommendation regarding the perceived shortcomings of its Food Strategy and the failure to publish a detailed response to the independent National Food Strategy review by instead discussing the UK Food Security Report, stating the next iteration …
6 Recommendation Seventh Report - Food security Deferred

Publish the detailed Whitehall response to each National Food Strategy independent review recommendation.

The Government should publish the detailed response to each of the NFSIR’s recommendations that it has drawn up within Whitehall as part of its response to this Report.

Government response. The government deflects the recommendation to publish its detailed response to the National Food Strategy independent review (NFSIR) by instead stating it is considering the recommendations from 'John Shropshire's review' on workforce shortages and intends to publish a response to …
7 Recommendation Seventh Report - Food security Deferred

Undertake a comprehensive Cabinet Office review of departmental food policy responsibilities and structures.

There is an incoherent approach to food policy across Government. Defra is designated as the Government department responsible for food policy, but 15 other departments and agencies are involved in different elements of development and delivery. The successes of food policy coordination across Whitehall forged during the covid-19 pandemic have …

Government response. The government's response completely avoids the recommendation for a Cabinet Office review of departmental responsibilities for food policy, instead discussing the UK's reliance on imported nitrogen fertiliser and the resilience of chemical supply chains.
8 Recommendation Seventh Report - Food security Deferred

Develop a comprehensive suite of food security indicators with targets to influence policy.

The Government Food Strategy (GFS) made only one commitment to food security: to maintain “broadly the same level in future” the UK’s current rate of self- sufficiency of 75% of commodities we can produce. Food security, though, is more than just self-sufficiency: the UK is reliant on food imports, mostly …

Government response. The government plans to publish a Land Use Framework for England this year, which will provide a long-term perspective on land uses for various aims including food security, but does not commit to developing a specific suite of food security …
9 Recommendation Seventh Report - Food security Deferred

Prioritise long-term food security by ensuring sufficient labour for the food supply chain.

We welcome the report of the Independent Review into Labour Shortages in the Food Supply Chain (the Shropshire Review), and support its recommendations regarding both skilled and seasonal migrant labour. Troublingly, the Shropshire Review has found evidence that the UK’s immigration policy is creating labour shortages that have “seriously impacted …

Government response. The government emphasized that food security is a multifaceted issue and it is preparing the next UK Food Security Report for publication by December 2024, but did not address the specific recommendations regarding labour shortages in the food supply chain …
10 Recommendation Seventh Report - Food security Deferred

Ensure continued UK production of nitrogen fertiliser and ammonia with a six-month action plan.

Nitrogen fertiliser plays a critical role in UK food security, and the production of ammonia used in it creates large amounts of carbon dioxide gas as a by-product which is vital for the food supply chain. There is only one plant remaining in the UK, which is currently using imported …

Government response. The government's response focused on household food security, tracking foodbank use, and providing financial support to low-income households through schemes like the National Living Wage, Healthy Start, and free school meals, entirely avoiding the recommendation regarding nitrogen fertiliser and ammonia …
11 Conclusion Seventh Report - Food security Deferred

Clarify Government priorities and private sector support within the forthcoming Land Use Framework.

We look forward to the publication of the Government’s Land Use Framework (LUF) for England, and welcome the report of the House of Lords’ Land Use Committee. The LUF should not be overly prescriptive, but it should make clear what the Government’s priorities are and how it will help the …

Government response. The government's response focused entirely on the eligibility criteria and cost of Free School Meals, stating it has no plans to change the current conditions but will keep them under review, thus deflecting from the recommendation about the Land Use …
12 Recommendation Seventh Report - Food security Deferred

Change Government's position to include household affordability and access in food security.

The Food Minister said that household affordability of, and access to, food does not constitute food security. We disagree. The high and sustained rate of food price inflation means many households are having to take measures to save money like skipping meals. This is happening across all across all socio-economic …

Government response. The government deflected by stating that the UK Mission to the UN in Geneva is in touch with the Special Procedures Branch of OHCHR regarding a visit request by the UN Special Rapporteur on Food, rather than addressing its own …
13 Conclusion Seventh Report - Food security Deferred

Pantry model offers dignified food aid, providing choice and worthy of wider adoption.

We applaud the work being done by charities in Liverpool and around the country to support those in need of food aid. In particular, the pantry model of food aid provided a sense of dignity to users, as well as choice, and is something we would encourage other food aid …

Government response. The government's response detailed its initiatives on healthier eating and obesity, including calorie labelling, product restrictions, and reformulation efforts, but did not address the committee's commendation of charity work or the pantry model for food aid.
14 Recommendation Seventh Report - Food security Deferred

Publish findings on sufficiency of household support to prevent regular food aid use

Higher food inflation and the rise in the cost of living more generally is meaning that food banks are experiencing record levels of demand this year. Earned income, not food banks, are ultimately the solution for household food insecurity. We welcome the substantial support packages, including the index-linked rise in …

Government response. The government stated it would not introduce new taxes that could increase food costs and affirmed that food affordability and access are key elements of its poverty strategy, but it did not commit to examining the sufficiency of existing support …
15 Recommendation Seventh Report - Food security Deferred

Urgently review and increase Free School Meals household income eligibility threshold

We welcome steps by the Government to expand free school meal (FSM) eligibility. More children are receiving FSM than ever before in England, including all infant school children. However, there is evidence that extending FSM eligibility further could reap substantial benefits that outweigh the costs. The Government should, as a …

Government response. The government's response focused on the Food Data Transparency Partnership and the delay of volume price promotion restrictions, completely deflecting from the recommendation to study and review Free School Meal eligibility criteria.
17 Recommendation Seventh Report - Food security Deferred

Respond to National Food Strategy Independent Review's analysis on health and food

The UK is in the midst of an obesity crisis and is facing a situation of around 40% of the adult population being obese by 2035. Unchecked, this will have profound consequences for the NHS. Food that is high in fat, sugar and salt (HFSS) is often considerably cheaper per …

Government response. The government explains it has considered the NFSIR's review and is undertaking an ambitious programme of work on healthy weight, including existing regulations and industry engagement, with further detail on diet and obesity to be set out in the Major …
23 Recommendation Seventh Report - Food security Deferred

Set out details and funding for five-year consumer education on healthy food choices

Better informing consumers about healthy, and unhealthy, food to help them to make the right choices is without doubt an important measure, and we welcome Government steps in this regard. Individuals should take responsibility for their food consumption and make healthier choices where this is possible. However, this alone is …

Government response. The government response completely deflects from the recommendation to set out details for a consumer education programme, discussing general food supply responsibilities and then providing a response to a different recommendation (#5) from the report.

Oral evidence sessions

5 sessions
Date Witnesses
24 Jan 2023 David Kennedy · Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, Rt Hon Mark Spencer · Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs View ↗
13 Dec 2022 Dr Kelly Parsons · MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Emily Hunter · The Woodland Trust, Mark Tufnell · Country Land and Business Association (CLA), Professor Michael Winter, University of Exeter, Centre for Rural Policy Research, Professor Tim Lang · City University London's Centre for Food Policy View ↗
22 Nov 2022 Anna Taylor · The Food Foundation, Lindsay Boswell · FareShare, Maria Marshall · Independent Food Aid Network (IFAN), Professor Michael Fakhri · University of Oregon School of Law View ↗
8 Nov 2022 Andrew Opie · British Retail Consortium (BRC), David Thomson · Food and Drink Federation (FDF), Ed Barker · Agricultural Industries Confederation (AIC), James Walton · IGD (Institute of Grocery Distribution), Minette Batters · National Farmers Union, Will Jackson · Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board (AHDB) View ↗
18 Oct 2022 Henry Dimbleby · Leon Restaurants View ↗

Correspondence

1 letter
DateDirectionTitle
22 Mar 2023 To cttee Letter from the Minister for Food, Farming and Fisheries to the Committee regar…