Source · Select Committees · Health and Social Care Committee

Third Report - Coronavirus: lessons learned to date

Health and Social Care Committee HC 92 Published 12 October 2021
Report Status
Government responded
Conclusions & Recommendations
200 items (51 recs)
Government Response
AI assessment · 170 of 200 classified
Accepted 37
Accepted in Part 32
Acknowledged 24
Not Addressed 72
Rejected 5
Government response
Government Response to the Health and Social Care Committee and Science and Technology Committee joint report: Coronavirus: lessons  learned  to date · published 16 Jun 2022
Read the government response ↗ Response on the Index
Filter by: Clear

Recommendations & Conclusions

5 items
60 Conclusion Rejected

The operation of COBR was not well-suited to the modern demands of a pandemic response.

Conclusion
The operation of COBR was not well-suited to the modern demands of a pandemic response. It is especially concerning that its culture of confidentiality was considered by some to be so unreliable that alternative meetings were arranged that could command … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government explicitly rejected the committee's assessment, disagreeing that COBR was ill-suited for pandemic response or that its confidentiality culture was unreliable. They defended COBR's role and ongoing review processes.
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology Department of Health and Social Care
View Details →
61 Conclusion Rejected

The Civil Contingencies Secretariat did not have adequate resources to maintain a substantial standing capability...

Conclusion
The Civil Contingencies Secretariat did not have adequate resources to maintain a substantial standing capability to survey the development of potential threats, and it had a limited reach into the range of Government departments required to respond to a pandemic. … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government rejects the observation that the Civil Contingencies Secretariat lacked adequate resources and reach. It states that a range of existing capabilities, including near-term horizon scanning, the Joint Intelligence Organisation, and the National Situation Centre, already identify and assess risks.
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology Department of Health and Social Care
View Details →
65 Recommendation Rejected

A standing capability should be established in Government, or reporting to it, to scan the...

Recommendation
A standing capability should be established in Government, or reporting to it, to scan the horizon for future threats, with adequate resource and counting on specialists with an independence from short-term political and administrative pressures.
Government Response Summary
The government rejects the recommendation to establish a new standing capability for horizon scanning, stating that a range of existing complementary capabilities already address this need, including the Civil Contingencies Secretariat, the Joint Intelligence Organisation, and the National Situation Centre.
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology Department of Health and Social Care
View Details →
170 Conclusion Rejected

In evidence to the Science and Technology Committee on 25 March 2020 Public Health England...

Conclusion
In evidence to the Science and Technology Committee on 25 March 2020 Public Health England claimed to have formally studied, but rejected, the South Korean approach.255 Despite repeated requests by the Committee no evidence of such an evaluation has ever … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government partially accepts the recommendation by agreeing it is important to learn from other countries and detailing how UKHSA will facilitate this. However, it explicitly rejects the committee's specific conclusion that a negligent omission occurred or that a culture of rejecting assistance was established regarding the South Korean approach.
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology Department of Health and Social Care
View Details →
8 Recommendation Rejected

A standing capability should be established in Government, or reporting to it, to scan the...

Recommendation
A standing capability should be established in Government, or reporting to it, to scan the horizon for future threats, with adequate resource and counting on specialists with an independence from short-term political and administrative pressures. (Paragraph 65) Coronavirus: lessons learned … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government rejects the recommendation, stating that a range of complementary standing capabilities already exist across various departments and organisations to identify and assess current and future risks.
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology Department of Health and Social Care
View Details →