Select committee: Health and Social Care Committee

Food and Weight Management

Open Opened 17 Jul 2025 25 recommendations 41 conclusions
Inquiry scope (the committee's words)
The Committee is holding an inquiry into food and weight management, including treatments for obesity. In 2022, 64% of adults in England were either overweight or living with obesity. In its 10-year health plan, the Government pledged to “launch a moonshot to end the obesity epidemic”. The Committee’s inquiry will investigate what public health interventions have been the most effective at reducing obesity and the consumption of less healthy foods, examining why existing policies relating to food and diet have seemingly not succeeded in reducing rates of obesity. The inquiry will also consider treatments offered to those who are living with obesity or excess weight, including the challenges and opportunities weight loss medications like Wegovy and Mounjaro present to the NHS and to individuals. It will consider how injections compare to other treatments and programmes, including cost-effectiveness. The Committee invites written evidence from Thursday 17 July until 11.59pm on Thursday 28 August. The Committee is also keen to hear directly from individuals with lived experience of living with obesity and excess weight, encouraging anybody with experiences of managing their weight and/or accessing treatments to share their perspectives in its online survey .

Where it stands

The inquiry is open, opened 17 July 2025.

The committee has published 3 reports, most recently 6th Report - The obesity moonshot: making obesity a political priority on 30 October 2026.

The government's response to each report

6th Report - The obesity moonshot: making obesity a political priority

Government response awaited: deadline 30 December 2026.

5th Report - Food and Weight Management: Modernising obesity treatment

Government response awaited: deadline 23 December 2026.

3rd Report – Food and Weight Management: Fixing the food environment

No government response linked yet: deadline 15 September 2026, 47 days ago.

Recommendations and conclusions

  • Conclusion 1Conclusion · 3rd Report – Food and Weight Management: Fixing the food environment
  • Conclusion 2Conclusion · 3rd Report – Food and Weight Management: Fixing the food environment
  • Recommendation 3Recommendation · 3rd Report – Food and Weight Management: Fixing the food environment
All 66 recommendations and conclusions

Reports

All reports

Evidence

  • 8 oral evidence sessionsLatest 3 June 2026
  • 171 written submissions
  • 39 witnesses
All evidence

Recent activity

Recommendations and conclusions 66 shown

Conclusion 1

Conclusion · 3rd Report – Food and Weight Management: Fixing the food environment · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Concluded (the committee's words)
We were unconvinced by the evidence we received from the supermarkets regarding their concerns about the updated nutrient profiling model. The NPM underpins all the government’s regulatory action to prevent obesity, yet the version of the model being used is now nearly 22 years old. Though a new model was developed in 2018, eight years have now passed and that model is still to be implemented. The length of time between the creation of the model and its implementation is concerning and leaves important regulation built on out-of-date scientific advice. (Conclusion, Paragraph 13)

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 2

Conclusion · 3rd Report – Food and Weight Management: Fixing the food environment · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Concluded (the committee's words)
The 2018 nutrient profiling model should be implemented as soon as possible, and certainly no later than by the end of 2027. The government will hear a lot of representations against this, but should hold firm. While we are aware of the debate around free sugars, we do not believe that it should be allowed to delay implementing the 2018 model further and call on the government to publish its preferred way forward on free sugars as soon as possible. (Recommendation, Paragraph 14)

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 3

Recommendation · 3rd Report – Food and Weight Management: Fixing the food environment · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Recommended (the committee's words)
The government should also commit to regularly reviewing and updating the nutrient profile model so that we do not go another 22 years, or more, between updates. Reviewing and implementing an updated nutrient profiling model on a 10-year cycle would strike a sensible balance between reflecting evolving scientific advice and providing certainty to industry. (Recommendation, Paragraph 15)

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 4

Conclusion · 3rd Report – Food and Weight Management: Fixing the food environment · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Concluded (the committee's words)
Healthy sales reporting and targets are the government’s flagship policy for addressing the food environment in the 10 Year Health Plan, with much resting on their implementation and success. It has been over a year since the 10 Year Health Plan was published and no visible progress has been made towards designing, let alone implementing, this policy. (Conclusion, Paragraph 23) 52

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 5

Conclusion · 3rd Report – Food and Weight Management: Fixing the food environment · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Concluded (the committee's words)
Mandatory healthy sales reporting should be launched as soon as possible, with targets set for supermarkets within the next 12 months and for the wider food industry by the end of the Parliament. (Recommendation, Paragraph 24)

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 6

Conclusion · 3rd Report – Food and Weight Management: Fixing the food environment · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Concluded (the committee's words)
If the government is really committed to this policy and in future decides to set targets as a result, those targets are meaningless unless accompanied by a strict enforcement regime for ensuring companies meet targets. This could be overseen by the Food Standards Agency, with, for example, penalties on a sliding scale that could include fines and we would encourage government to use such revenue to make healthy food cheaper. (Recommendation, Paragraph 25)

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 7

Conclusion · 3rd Report – Food and Weight Management: Fixing the food environment · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Concluded (the committee's words)
Price is a key driver in consumer behaviour. It is welcome that action has been taken to reduce the number of volume-price promotions of HFSS foods. However, with healthier foods such as fruits and vegetables still generally being more expensive than HFSS foods, and the proportion of disposable income needed for the most deprived in the population to meet the cost of a healthy diet increasing, retailers should be encouraged to offer more price promotions on healthier foods. (Conclusion, Paragraph 36)

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 8

Recommendation · 3rd Report – Food and Weight Management: Fixing the food environment · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Recommended (the committee's words)
As part of plans for large businesses to report on healthy sales and progress towards healthy sales targets, the government should require those businesses to report on the price promotions it offers, specifically the percentage of such promotions on healthier foods like fruits and vegetables. (Recommendation, Paragraph 37)

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 9

Conclusion · 3rd Report – Food and Weight Management: Fixing the food environment · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Concluded (the committee's words)
Healthy Start is a lifeline to many families who might otherwise struggle to find the budget for healthier foods for their children. It is especially impactful during a time of increasing food prices, with healthier foods often being more expensive than unhealthy foods. However, the scheme as it is currently designed is not reaching its full potential, has not kept up with the rising cost of living and is reaching too few eligible families. (Conclusion, Paragraph 49)

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 10

Conclusion · 3rd Report – Food and Weight Management: Fixing the food environment · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Concluded (the committee's words)
The Healthy Start programme should be updated in the following ways: a. the value of vouchers should be updated to reflect the level of food inflation and there should be an annual review of value to ensure its real terms value is maintained; b. technical barriers must be resolved within 6 months to support retailers to provide top-ups to families where they wish to do so; c. the age threshold for eligibility should increase to the September at which a child begins school, in order to bridge the gap between Healthy Start and universal infant free school meals; 53 d. All children in households that receive Universal Credit should be eligible, as is the case for free school meals; and e. DHSC should work with the Department for Work and Pensions to set out a plan to resolve data sharing issues and remove legislative barriers to implementing auto-enrolment within 12 months. The plan should include milestones and dates to ensure accountability for progress. (Recommendation, Paragraph 50)

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 11

Recommendation · 3rd Report – Food and Weight Management: Fixing the food environment · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Recommended (the committee's words)
The government should also launch a public awareness campaign within the next three months to drive improved uptake of the Healthy Start scheme, modelled on the approach taken in Scotland. The government must also commit to publish annual data on uptake of the Healthy Start scheme, with as granular geographical information as possible, so that the impact of efforts to drive higher uptake can be monitored and evaluated. (Recommendation, Paragraph 51)

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 12

Conclusion · 3rd Report – Food and Weight Management: Fixing the food environment · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Concluded (the committee's words)
Local projects to support access to healthier foods are doing fantastic work in their communities and seeing real results, using local knowledge and building strong community relationships to drive change. Community projects need to be a core part of any work to address the challenges in the food system and the government needs to better recognise their value by providing them with secure, long-term funding. While we welcome that Pride in Place funding can be used for projects that support low-income families to access healthy foods, given the large range of interventions this programme can support, we do not believe that it should be the main mechanism to finance these projects. (Conclusion, Paragraph 59)

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 13

Recommendation · 3rd Report – Food and Weight Management: Fixing the food environment · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Recommended (the committee's words)
We therefore repeat the recommendation previously made by Sir Henry Dimbleby that the government should establish a “Community Eatwell” programme to provide healthy eating support to families and individuals on low incomes experiencing food-related ill health. The government should also work with industry to secure match-funding for this programme. (Recommendation, Paragraph 60)

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 14

Conclusion · 3rd Report – Food and Weight Management: Fixing the food environment · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Concluded (the committee's words)
Clear and consistent labelling supports customers to make more informed choices about the food they are buying. Existing traffic light labelling is not mandatory, and it is inconsistently applied: this needs to change. (Conclusion, Paragraph 67)

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 15

Recommendation · 3rd Report – Food and Weight Management: Fixing the food environment · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Recommended (the committee's words)
The government should introduce mandatory front-of-pack labelling by January 2028. While we acknowledge that the traffic light approach is not perfect, we nevertheless recommend using the pre-existing label as its template as this is familiar to consumers and widely used by manufacturers in the market, so should cause the least disruption to businesses and support swift implementation. (Recommendation, Paragraph 68) 54

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 16

Recommendation · 3rd Report – Food and Weight Management: Fixing the food environment · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Recommended (the committee's words)
In addition, the government should take steps to explore how to ensure the effectiveness of front-of-pack labelling in the long term, including: a. how to make front-of pack information clear for consumers and ensure it avoids contradictory health and nutrition messaging; b. learning from labelling used in other countries, such as the French Nutri-Score or the Chilean ‘warning labels’ approach; c. regularly reviewing labelling to ensure it takes account of emerging scientific evidence, including changes to the nutrient profiling model. (Recommendation, Paragraph 69)

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 17

Conclusion · 3rd Report – Food and Weight Management: Fixing the food environment · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Concluded (the committee's words)
We acknowledge the efforts that manufacturers have gone to in reformulating products to remove sugar, salt and fat and increase fibre, and the challenges that can come from this for smaller businesses. Taxation has been shown to drive producer behaviour through the soft drinks industry levy (SDIL), and we believe this should continue as a mechanism for driving reformulation. If the government is serious about improving the health of the nation, there is more it can do to support further reformulation, particularly for smaller manufacturers. (Conclusion, Paragraph 77)

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 18

Recommendation · 3rd Report – Food and Weight Management: Fixing the food environment · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Recommended (the committee's words)
To drive further reformulation, we recommend that the government: a. continues to explore how the SDIL can be expanded and sets out a timetable for reducing the threshold to its originally intended 4g per 100ml; b. develops an equivalent of the Scottish Reformulation for Health Programme to roll out to small and medium sized food and drink manufacturers across the rest of the UK. (Recommendation, Paragraph 78) Addressing the obesogenic environment

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 19

Conclusion · 3rd Report – Food and Weight Management: Fixing the food environment · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Concluded (the committee's words)
While some local authorities have already been using the planning system to improve their local food environment, the changes to the National Planning Policy Framework should encourage more local authorities to refuse applications for hot food takeaways and fast-food outlets where further provision would not benefit local population health. However, vague definitions risk undermining local authority attempts to create healthier environments by leaving them vulnerable to challenge from large corporations. Clearer guidance and tighter definitions are needed to ensure local authorities are in the strongest position to face down any challenges. The important voice of public health also needs to be strengthened in local authority planning policy. (Conclusion, Paragraph 90) 55

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 20

Recommendation · 3rd Report – Food and Weight Management: Fixing the food environment · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Recommended (the committee's words)
Working with the Office for Health Improvement and Disparities and directors of public health, we call on the government to: a. develop clearer definitions for the terms “hot food takeaway”, “fast- food outlet” and “reasonable walking distance” and develop guidance and provide practical support for local authorities to identify areas with high volumes of unhealthy food outlets and they should be resourced to develop plans to address these; b. review current use classes to ensure that establishments that are clearly operating as takeaways are not able to operate as Class E establishments and avoid restrictions; and c. mandate the involvement of public health officials in the development of local planning policy and decision making. (Recommendation, Paragraph 91)

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 21

Conclusion · 3rd Report – Food and Weight Management: Fixing the food environment · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Concluded (the committee's words)
The evidence is clear: advertising impacts on the consumption of HFSS foods. The government has already accepted this to some degree given the action already taken to restrict exposure to HFSS advertising, but it must be bolder. Its current approach leaves the majority of advertising untouched and undermines the intention of restricting exposure. No effort has also been made to encourage advertising to be healthier. (Conclusion, Paragraph 112)

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 22

Conclusion · 3rd Report – Food and Weight Management: Fixing the food environment · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Concluded (the committee's words)
Advertising methods are changing quickly, with the rising prominence of social media advertising, digital advertising, sport sponsorship, online gaming and direct marketing through app notification. Existing regulations do not adequately address these forms of advertising. Further delay to strengthening restrictions must be avoided. Given it took nearly five years from announcing to implementing the policy to ban HFSS, waiting another five years for the post-implementation review before taking further action is unacceptable. Action is needed now if the government is serious about protecting children’s health. (Conclusion, Paragraph 113)

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 23

Conclusion · 3rd Report – Food and Weight Management: Fixing the food environment · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Concluded (the committee's words)
On a local level, some local authorities are working hard to improve their own food environment through bans to outdoor advertising, but they are severely limited due to only being able to target council-owned assets. To ensure a consistent approach, to address the fact that areas of higher deprivation have a higher prevalence of outdoor advertising and to protect local councils from challenge from large food businesses, a national approach is needed. (Conclusion, Paragraph 114)

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 24

Conclusion · 3rd Report – Food and Weight Management: Fixing the food environment · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Concluded (the committee's words)
A holistic, consistent and watertight approach to restricting the exposure of children to all HFSS advertising needs to be developed. It should include: 56 a. bringing brand and range advertising into the scope of existing regulations as soon as possible and certainly not waiting for the five- year implementation period to gather evidence on this: evidence is already plentiful; b. developing new regulation, or updating existing regulation, to ban all outdoor advertising of HFSS foods, to be implemented by July 2027; c. launching a consultation on extending regulations to restrict exposure to HFSS foods to other forms of advertising, such as sports sponsorship, social media, mobile phone app notifications and online gaming; and d. updating advertising regulations to require food companies to dedicate resource to advertising healthy products. (Recommendation, Paragraph 115)

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 25

Conclusion · 3rd Report – Food and Weight Management: Fixing the food environment · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Concluded (the committee's words)
Existing regulation could be better used to play a more active role in building healthier retail environments. While we are encouraged that changing shop layouts is one of the government’s suggested ways of achieving healthier sales, given there will likely be some time before the healthy sales targets are set, action should be taken now. (Conclusion, Paragraph 121)

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 26

Conclusion · 3rd Report – Food and Weight Management: Fixing the food environment · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Concluded (the committee's words)
It is concerning that HFSS foods continue to feature prominently on pages on retailer websites that are not covered by existing regulations, particularly special offers pages. We know that price is a driver of shopping habits and so believe that special offers pages should be included as an example of a ‘prominent’ location online. (Conclusion, Paragraph 122)

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 27

Conclusion · 3rd Report – Food and Weight Management: Fixing the food environment · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Concluded (the committee's words)
The Food (Promotion and Placement) (England) Regulations 2021 should be updated no later than January 2027 to: a. include a requirement to place fruits and vegetables in prominent instore locations like checkouts and store entrances; and b. extend the definition of a prominent location on a website to include ‘special offers’ pages. (Recommendation, Paragraph 123) Prioritising health in food policy

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 28

Conclusion · 3rd Report – Food and Weight Management: Fixing the food environment · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Concluded (the committee's words)
Policies to support a reduction in the consumption of HFSS foods stand no chance of success if they are not strongly enforced. Businesses need to be clear that there will be consequence for failing to meet their legal requirements to create healthier environments in their stores. (Conclusion, Paragraph 133) 57

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 29

Conclusion · 3rd Report – Food and Weight Management: Fixing the food environment · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Concluded (the committee's words)
We are concerned by the lack of enforcement of policies and recommend the government review the extent to which its policies are being enforced and, in its response to us, set out detail on resources available for enforcement. (Recommendation, Paragraph 134)

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 30

Conclusion · 3rd Report – Food and Weight Management: Fixing the food environment · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Concluded (the committee's words)
The government needs to build and fund a more robust enforcement regime for existing and upcoming regulation, which should include: a. improved, ring-fenced funding and an improved training offer for local authority trading standards and environmental health teams to improve their capacity to address all enforcement issues; and b. stronger penalties that act as a real deterrent for businesses, with a move away from fixed penalties towards a penalty based on the size of the business. (Recommendation, Paragraph 135)

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 31

Conclusion · 3rd Report – Food and Weight Management: Fixing the food environment · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Concluded (the committee's words)
The Food Standards Agency’s role should be expanded to cover the healthiness of food, as well as food safety. It should report to Parliament on progress towards healthier food production and on meeting targets for healthy food sales. This expanded role should be accompanied by additional funding and staff. (Recommendation, Paragraph 136)

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 32

Conclusion · 3rd Report – Food and Weight Management: Fixing the food environment · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Concluded (the committee's words)
The current regulatory framework does not create a level playing field across all settings where food is purchased, largely ignores the out-of-home sector, has a blind spot around delivery apps and is littered with loopholes that ultimately undermine the intended health improvement outcomes from these policies. We are concerned by insufficient thinking about the role that the out-of-home sector might play in improving the nation’s diet and urge the government to work to better understand this sector. (Conclusion, Paragraph 141)

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 33

Recommendation · 3rd Report – Food and Weight Management: Fixing the food environment · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Recommended (the committee's words)
A more strategic and holistic view of food policy that seeks to improve the healthiness of food and the food environment is needed. The government should either extend the scope of existing regulation or create new regulation to ensure that the prominence and promotion of HFSS foods is reduced across all food retailers and not only supermarkets. It should also work to better understand what role the out-of-home sector and delivery apps can play in improving diets and set out how it will work to improve the healthiness of food in out-of-home settings, including better data collection, new policy ideas and relevant support for those businesses to implement any changes within 18 months. (Recommendation, Paragraph 142)

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 34

Conclusion · 3rd Report – Food and Weight Management: Fixing the food environment · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Concluded (the committee's words)
Throughout our inquiry we have seen examples where time and time again policy that has been designed to protect and improve children’s health and the health of the population is delayed or diluted in the face of threats from the food industry about the impact on food prices, jobs or the economy. Governments have consistently chosen to put those interests ahead of 58 health interests. This government cannot continue that pattern. It must be bolder and show unwavering commitment to the cause of preventing obesity. (Conclusion, Paragraph 148)

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 35

Recommendation · 3rd Report – Food and Weight Management: Fixing the food environment · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Recommended (the committee's words)
We agree with the House of Lords Food, Diet and Obesity Committee that the government should exclude food businesses that derive more than a certain proportion of sales from less healthy products from any discussions on the formation of policy on food, diet and obesity prevention. This should also apply to the industry associations that represent these businesses. Engagement on the practical application of regulation once it has been decided may be appropriate and must be subject to full transparency and clear rules of engagement. (Recommendation, Paragraph 149)

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 36

Conclusion · 3rd Report – Food and Weight Management: Fixing the food environment · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Concluded (the committee's words)
While we acknowledge the costs of policy changes to the food industry, these are marginal when compared to the huge costs of inaction on obesity to society, the economy and the health service. In the event that policy relating to the healthiness of food is delayed or substantially changed, Parliament must be given a timely update as to the reasons why and what impact these changes would have on the effectiveness of the measure in reducing obesity, and costs to the NHS and the wider economy of not proceeding as originally planned. (Recommendation, Paragraph 150) 59

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 1

Conclusion · 5th Report - Food and Weight Management: Modernising obesity treatment · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Concluded (the committee's words)
People living with obesity are being let down by the NHS. A range of effective interventions to treat obesity are available, ranging from behavioural support to medicine to surgery. Yet we repeatedly heard of people spending years trying to get the health service to listen to them and offer them treatment. Access to GLP-1 medication appears increasingly to be determined by ability to pay rather than clinical need. Given that obesity already follows stark lines of deprivation and inequality, failing to provide equitable access will entrench and widen those disparities, letting down the patients who need support most. (Conclusion, Paragraph 8)

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 2

Recommendation · 5th Report - Food and Weight Management: Modernising obesity treatment · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Recommended (the committee's words)
Obesity is a lifelong, relapsing and remitting condition that requires ongoing management. We recommend that the government and NHS consistently define obesity in this way and believe that adopting this position will help drive change, particularly in the public perception of obesity. Weight management services need to be overhauled to reflect this way of viewing obesity, treating it in a similar manner to other long-term conditions. (Recommendation, Paragraph 15)

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 3

Conclusion · 5th Report - Food and Weight Management: Modernising obesity treatment · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Concluded (the committee's words)
Modern services frameworks set out how the NHS and partners will improve areas of care to achieve more consistent, high-quality services. Given the continuing rising rates of obesity, and the numerous ways in which patients are being let down by the current service provision, obesity care is a clear candidate for its own modern service framework. (Conclusion, Paragraph 19)

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 4

Conclusion · 5th Report - Food and Weight Management: Modernising obesity treatment · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Concluded (the committee's words)
We are concerned that the merger of the Department of Health and Social Care and NHS England could result in the loss of programmes currently commissioned by NHS England. Reassurance about future commissioning arrangements for such programmes is needed, which could be provided through a modern service framework. (Conclusion, Paragraph 20)

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 5

Recommendation · 5th Report - Food and Weight Management: Modernising obesity treatment · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Recommended (the committee's words)
The government should develop a modern service framework for obesity, recognising it as a lifelong condition and setting clear standards and targets that Integrated Care Boards are both supported in, and held accountable for, delivering. (Recommendation, Paragraph 21) 34 Designing an obesity modern service framework

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 6

Conclusion · 5th Report - Food and Weight Management: Modernising obesity treatment · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Concluded (the committee's words)
The Type 2 Diabetes Path to Remission programme has shown its potential for diabetes remission and weight loss, yet only a small proportion of people who might benefit are being offered the programme, due to the number of places and the lack of awareness amongst healthcare professionals. The national commissioning of the programme, which avoids areas having to design their own version of it, provides important lessons for any obesity service redesign. (Conclusion, Paragraph 29)

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 7

Conclusion · 5th Report - Food and Weight Management: Modernising obesity treatment · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Concluded (the committee's words)
An obesity modern service framework should support more patients to access the Type 2 Diabetes Path to Remission programme by setting targets for how many patients should be enrolled and expectations around GP referral to the programme. This will need to be supported by funding for additional places. (Recommendation, Paragraph 30)

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 8

Recommendation · 5th Report - Food and Weight Management: Modernising obesity treatment · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Recommended (the committee's words)
The government should review behavioural interventions that are offered across the country to identify which would benefit from a single national design that a range of providers can offer, in a similar way to the Type 2 Diabetes Path to Remission programme. It should also explore options for direct referral to programmes, including through the NHS App and central publicity campaigns. (Recommendation, Paragraph 31)

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 9

Conclusion · 5th Report - Food and Weight Management: Modernising obesity treatment · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Concluded (the committee's words)
Bariatric surgery is a cost-effective underutilised treatment for obesity. Current provision is unacceptably limited and not all who might benefit from surgery can access it. (Conclusion, Paragraph 35)

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 10

Recommendation · 5th Report - Food and Weight Management: Modernising obesity treatment · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Recommended (the committee's words)
The obesity modern service framework should commit to an increase in the number of bariatric procedures carried out per year, to ensure the UK does not lag behind its counterparts. We recommend that this is initially a doubling of the current provision, to around 13,000 procedures. This target should be reviewed every five years. To support this, the government should explore options for expanding existing, or building new, surgical hubs for bariatric surgery, prioritising areas with little to no provision. (Recommendation, Paragraph 36)

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 11

Conclusion · 5th Report - Food and Weight Management: Modernising obesity treatment · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Concluded (the committee's words)
Current plans to rollout Mounjaro are unambitious given the scale of the challenge of obesity and reach a woefully small number of people who could benefit from this lifechanging treatment. We acknowledge there are challenges relating to capacity and funding. However, given the much larger number of private prescriptions of GLP-1s, we believe there are opportunities to learn from the private sector and better use the capacity of digital providers. With the GLP-1 landscape changing and 35 the likely reduction in costs as and when these medicines move off-patent, the system needs to be designed to support wider access now and be ready for the future. (Conclusion, Paragraph 44)

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 12

Recommendation · 5th Report - Food and Weight Management: Modernising obesity treatment · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Recommended (the committee's words)
The government must urgently reassess the pace of rollout of Mounjaro. This should include making better use of the capacity of digital providers. As a first step, the department should hold a summit on GLP-1 access with a range of providers and healthcare professionals to open a dialogue on how best to improve the rollout. (Recommendation, Paragraph 45)

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 13

Conclusion · 5th Report - Food and Weight Management: Modernising obesity treatment · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Concluded (the committee's words)
The obesity modern service framework should include ambitious targets for the proportion of a local population that should be able to access GLP-1s and targets for how much of this should be delivered through digital platforms. (Recommendation, Paragraph 46)

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 14

Conclusion · 5th Report - Food and Weight Management: Modernising obesity treatment · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Concluded (the committee's words)
To truly take advantage of opportunities for weight management service provision outside of general practice, data sharing needs to be improved. A failure to act risks inappropriate prescribing and a continued burden on GPs who are asked to confirm patient details or update records. (Conclusion, Paragraph 47)

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 15

Recommendation · 5th Report - Food and Weight Management: Modernising obesity treatment · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Recommended (the committee's words)
The government should ensure that appropriately regulated digital providers and pharmacies have secure access to relevant patient information and the ability to update records to show that a patient is receiving a GLP-1. The government should set out how the planned Single Patient Record can support this and, while that is still being developed, find a temporary solution that gives providers better access, such as expanding access to summary care records. In its response to this report, the government should set out a clear timetable for expanding access to shared records and explain how it will ensure robust safeguards for patient privacy and data security. (Recommendation, Paragraph 48)

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 16

Conclusion · 5th Report - Food and Weight Management: Modernising obesity treatment · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Concluded (the committee's words)
Wraparound support is a vital component of obesity care, no matter which treatment is being used. Losing a large amount of weight is a major life event, and challenges with living with obesity can impact on people’s mental health. As such, mental health support must be a core part of wraparound care. (Conclusion, Paragraph 55)

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 17

Recommendation · 5th Report - Food and Weight Management: Modernising obesity treatment · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Recommended (the committee's words)
The obesity modern service framework should ensure that all obesity treatments are accompanied by consistent, long-term wraparound support, including nutritional, behavioural and mental health services and require that uptake data is routinely collected. For bariatric surgery, eligibility for aftercare should extend beyond current minimum requirements, with clear shared-care arrangements in primary care and improved training for healthcare professionals to ensure patients receive appropriate lifelong monitoring and support. Where the NHS relies on private, 36 digital providers, it should seek assurance that they are meeting obligations for wraparound care and should set out how it will obtain this assurance in response to this report. (Recommendation, Paragraph 56)

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 18

Conclusion · 5th Report - Food and Weight Management: Modernising obesity treatment · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Concluded (the committee's words)
The rising number of children with obesity should alarm us all. Any redesign of services must ensure that children living with obesity get the specialised, holistic support they need. (Conclusion, Paragraph 61)

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 19

Conclusion · 5th Report - Food and Weight Management: Modernising obesity treatment · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Concluded (the committee's words)
The obesity modern service framework must include a specific section dedicated to support for children, focusing on evidence-based effective, person-centred interventions such as the CEW clinics. It should include targets for the proportion of children living with obesity who are accessing specialist support. (Recommendation, Paragraph 62)

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 20

Recommendation · 5th Report - Food and Weight Management: Modernising obesity treatment · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Recommended (the committee's words)
Funding for existing CEW clinics must be maintained after the end of the pilot period, and this should be committed to as soon as possible. The government should then explore how these services could be expanded. (Recommendation, Paragraph 63)

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 21

Conclusion · 5th Report - Food and Weight Management: Modernising obesity treatment · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Concluded (the committee's words)
Obesity services are currently fragmented, inconsistent and difficult to navigate, with significant variation in provision across the country and no clear pathway for patients or healthcare professionals to follow. This places an unfair burden on individuals living with obesity to identify, access and sometimes advocate for appropriate treatment themselves. The current system is poorly designed for a chronic, relapsing condition, relying instead on disconnected, time-limited interventions that fail to provide continuity of care, the ability to move between treatments, or support people throughout their lives. (Conclusion, Paragraph 69)

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 22

Recommendation · 5th Report - Food and Weight Management: Modernising obesity treatment · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Recommended (the committee's words)
The obesity modern service framework should set out expectations around a new, simplified and consistent obesity care pathway, designed at all levels with lived experience input, with improved guidance for professionals, more standardised referral criteria, and the potential for other settings to refer into the pathway. The pathway should ensure that patients receive long-term support and condition management and can remain within the service if a treatment option does not prove effective. (Recommendation, Paragraph 70)

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 23

Recommendation · 5th Report - Food and Weight Management: Modernising obesity treatment · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Recommended (the committee's words)
The modern service framework should make data collection mandatory, including information on referrals, treatment uptake, outcomes and patient experience. Data must be collected throughout a course of treatment and across the patient’s lifetime and the modern service framework should set out suggestions for the most effective points at which to collect data. (Recommendation, Paragraph 71) 37

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 24

Conclusion · 5th Report - Food and Weight Management: Modernising obesity treatment · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Concluded (the committee's words)
It is unacceptable that, despite the prevalence of obesity and its impact on all areas of health and wellbeing, training specifically on obesity is so limited. Healthcare professionals need to be supported to gain a modern understanding of obesity, provide sensitive and stigma-free care and be able to provide expertise and treatment options to patients. (Conclusion, Paragraph 76)

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 25

Recommendation · 5th Report - Food and Weight Management: Modernising obesity treatment · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Recommended (the committee's words)
The modern service framework should set out expectations for improving workforce training on obesity. It should include a target to upskill GPs in particular, given their central role in access to obesity treatments. To support this, undergraduate medical education needs to incorporate education and training on obesity as a core component, increasing both the quantity and quality of training provided. For existing professionals, a set of mandatory training modules, in the style of the Oliver McGown training, should be introduced. (Recommendation, Paragraph 77)

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 26

Recommendation · 5th Report - Food and Weight Management: Modernising obesity treatment · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Recommended (the committee's words)
We heard that GPs struggle to access training on obesity due to a lack of protected continued professional development time. We acknowledge that GP training time is an issue that goes beyond obesity training and may have wider implications, so we recommend that the government explore options for giving GPs this protected time as part of future contact negotiations. (Recommendation, Paragraph 78) The regulatory landscape

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 27

Conclusion · 5th Report - Food and Weight Management: Modernising obesity treatment · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Concluded (the committee's words)
While we acknowledge the ongoing efforts to tackle the illegal trade of GLP-1s, we remain concerned that the regulatory system is inadequately equipped to keep up with the scale of demand for GLP-1s, or flexible enough to deal with changes such as patent expiry and the availability of tablets. There are already examples of harm to people who have accessed illegal GLP-1s online, and we are concerned that these will increase as availability and demand for these products increases. The MHRA seems to be playing catch up, rather than proactively addressing this challenge, particularly with social media. (Conclusion, Paragraph 84)

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 28

Recommendation · 5th Report - Food and Weight Management: Modernising obesity treatment · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Recommended (the committee's words)
The government must review the capacity and capabilities of the MHRA and set out whether it considers the Agency is sufficiently resourced to address the illegal trade in GLP-1s, including the technology and equipment to tackle related social media content. (Recommendation, Paragraph 85)

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 29

Recommendation · 5th Report - Food and Weight Management: Modernising obesity treatment · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Recommended (the committee's words)
A joined-up action plan for dealing with illegal trade in GLP-1s and access to them through social media, setting out clear areas of responsibility, should be developed. It should have ministerial oversight and the minister should provide regular updates on metrics such as products seized and social media posts or accounts removed. In addition, the government should 38 explore how social media companies can be compelled to remove posts or accounts, including whether powers of the MHRA need to be expanded to enable this. (Recommendation, Paragraph 86)

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 30

Recommendation · 5th Report - Food and Weight Management: Modernising obesity treatment · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Recommended (the committee's words)
Further work is required to raise public awareness of the dangers of accessing GLP-1s through unregulated sources and social media, and how to access GLP-1s safely. The government should launch a public awareness campaign to reach members of the public most likely to consider buying from unregulated sources. The campaign should be informed by research into the best channels, platforms, voices and timing for such messaging. (Recommendation, Paragraph 87) 39

Link to this item · Read this item

Reports

3 reports

Oral evidence sessions

8 sessions

On smaller screens, scroll horizontally to read every column. Keyboard users can focus the table region and use the arrow keys.

Date Session and witnesses Source
3 Jun 2026
Oral Evidence
Dr Clare Hambling · NHS England, Natasha Burgon · Department of Health and Social Care, Prof Aidan Fowler · NHS England, Sharon Hodgson MP · Department of Health and Social Care
View ↗
19 May 2026
Oral Evidence
Colette Marshall · Diabetes UK, Dimitri Pournaras · British Obesity and Metabolic Specialist Society (BOMSS), Dr Neil O'Brien · North East and North Cumbria ICB, Professor Roy Taylor · DiRECT Study
View ↗
25 Mar 2026
Oral Evidence
Andy Morling · Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), Claire Nevinson · Boots UK, Dr Kieran Seyan · Pharmacy2U, Dr Simon Doyle · Coalition of Responsible Digital Health, John Spoors · National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), Neha Ramaiya · General Pharmaceutical Council (GPhC)
View ↗
25 Feb 2026
Oral Evidence
Dr Claudia Coelho · The Association for the Study of Obesity, Dr Emily Pegg · Lilly UK, Dr Kath McCullough · Royal College of Physicians, Dr Munro Stewart · Royal College of General Practitioners, Professor Susan Jebb · Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences at the University of Oxford
View ↗
28 Jan 2026
Oral Evidence
Beth Fowler · Asda, Liz Fox · aldi, Nilani Sritharan · Sainsbury’s, Oonagh Turnbull · Tesco
View ↗
3 Dec 2025
Oral Evidence
Jim Cathcart · UKHospitality, Kate Halliwell · Food and Drink Federation
View ↗
5 Nov 2025
Oral Evidence
Dr Kawther Hashem · Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University London, Katharine Jenner · Obesity Health Alliance, Lauren Bowes Byatt · Nesta, Michael Baber · Health Action Research Group, Nika Pajda · Bite Back, Professor Christina Vogel · Centre for Food Policy, City St George's, University of London, Professor Chris van Tulleken · University College London
View ↗
15 Oct 2025
Oral Evidence
Alice · Bite Back, Alice Wiseman · Association of Directors of Public Health, Anna Taylor · Food Foundation, Corin Bell · Alexandra Rose Charity, Evette · Food Foundation, Helen Gollins · Greater Manchester Public Health Network, Jayda · Bite Back
View ↗

Written evidence

171 submissions recorded

Submission metadata is shown here; use the source links to read the evidence on Parliament’s website.

Showing the latest 50 of 171 recorded submissions. Written evidence in the activity timeline uses this same preview. Browse the inquiry on Parliament.

On smaller screens, scroll horizontally to read every column. Keyboard users can focus the table region and use the arrow keys.

ReferenceDateSubmitter
FWM0164 2 Sep 2026 British Medical Association
FWM0191 8 Jul 2026 Arthritis UK
FWM0193 7 Jul 2026 Uber Eats
FWM0194 7 Jul 2026 The Food Foundation
FWM0189 3 Jul 2026 Coalition for Responsible Digital Health
FWM0192 2 Jul 2026 Diabetes UK
FWM0190 2 Jul 2026 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
FWM0187 14 May 2026 Food Standard Agency
FWM0188 14 May 2026 NHS England
FWM0034 23 Mar 2026 Sustain: the alliance for better food and farming
FWM0074 18 Mar 2026 Local Health and Global Profits
FWM0185 18 Mar 2026 Alexandra Rose Charity
FWM0047 18 Mar 2026 Mrs Lorna Campbell
FWM0070 3 Feb 2026 Menwell Pty Ltd (trading as Voy)
FWM0118 3 Feb 2026 FaceDonate.org
FWM0120 3 Feb 2026 National Pharmacy Association
FWM0119 3 Feb 2026 Independent Pharmacies Association
FWM0090 3 Feb 2026 Oviva
FWM0089 3 Feb 2026 Kidney Research UK
FWM0088 3 Feb 2026 Association of Directors of Public Health
FWM0086 3 Feb 2026 WHO Collaborating Centre in Nutritional Epidemiology, University of Leeds
FWM0085 3 Feb 2026 Norwich Research Park
FWM0083 3 Feb 2026 The Health Foundation
FWM0082 3 Feb 2026 World Cancer Research Fund
FWM0081 3 Feb 2026 PrescQIPP CIC
FWM0080 3 Feb 2026 Oatly
FWM0079 3 Feb 2026 Yorkshire Cancer Research
FWM0078 3 Feb 2026 Professor Susan Jebb, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford
FWM0077 3 Feb 2026 The Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh
FWM0076 3 Feb 2026 Fresh Balance
FWM0072 3 Feb 2026 British Dietetic Association, Obesity Specialist Group
FWM0071 3 Feb 2026 Obesity Action Scotland
FWM0069 3 Feb 2026 Baroness Joan Walmsley, House of Lords
FWM0068 3 Feb 2026 Essex County Council
FWM0067 3 Feb 2026 Dr Stuart Gillespie, International Food Policy Research Institute
FWM0066 3 Feb 2026 Royal College of General Practitioners
FWM0065 3 Feb 2026 Alternative Proteins Association
FWM0064 3 Feb 2026 Wakefield District Council Public Health Department
FWM0063 3 Feb 2026 Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council
FWM0062 3 Feb 2026 The Investor Coalition on Food Policy
FWM0061 3 Feb 2026 Boots UK
FWM0060 3 Feb 2026 Feeding Britain
FWM0059 3 Feb 2026 Nomad Foods
FWM0058 3 Feb 2026 Natural Source Waters Association
FWM0057 3 Feb 2026 Warburtons
FWM0055 3 Feb 2026 Health Equalities Group
FWM0117 3 Feb 2026 Prof Franco Sassi, Imperial College London
FWM0116 3 Feb 2026 Alcohol Focus Scotland
FWM0115 3 Feb 2026 WINN UK
FWM0114 3 Feb 2026 Advertising Association

Who gave evidence

39 witnesses

On smaller screens, scroll horizontally to read every column. Keyboard users can focus the table region and use the arrow keys.

WitnessOrganisationSessions
Alice · Youth activist Bite Back 1
Alice Wiseman · Vice President Association of Directors of Public Health 1
Andy Morling · Deputy Director of Criminal Enforcement & Head of the Criminal Enforcement Unit Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) 1
Anna Taylor · Chief Executive Food Foundation 1
Beth Fowler · Senior Manager Healthy and Sustainable Choice Asda 1
Claire Nevinson · Superintendent Pharmacist Boots UK 1
Colette Marshall · Chief Executive Diabetes UK 1
Corin Bell · Chief Executive Officer Alexandra Rose Charity 1
Dimitri Pournaras · Consultant Upper Gastrointestinal and Bariatric Surgeon and Council Member British Obesity and Metabolic Specialist Society (BOMSS) 1
Dr Clare Hambling · National Clinical Director for Diabetes and Obesity NHS England 1
Dr Claudia Coelho · Adult Centres for Obesity Management Lead The Association for the Study of Obesity 1
Dr Emily Pegg · Associate Vice President (Medical) Lilly UK 1
Dr Kath McCullough · Special Adviser on Obesity Royal College of Physicians 1
Dr Kawther Hashem · Senior Lecturer in Public Health Nutrition Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University London 1
Dr Kieran Seyan · Chief Medical Officer Pharmacy2U 1
Dr Munro Stewart · Vice Chair (Policy) Royal College of General Practitioners 1
Dr Neil O'Brien · Chief Medical Officer North East and North Cumbria ICB 1
Dr Simon Doyle · Public Policy and Partnerships Lead at Eucalyptus (Juniper) Coalition of Responsible Digital Health 1
Evette · Food Ambassador Food Foundation 1
Helen Gollins · Chair Greater Manchester Public Health Network 1
Jayda · Youth activist Bite Back 1
Jim Cathcart · Policy Director UKHospitality 1
John Spoors · Programme Director for Commercial, Managed Access and Medicines Policy National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) 1
Kate Halliwell · Chief Scientific Officer Food and Drink Federation 1
Katharine Jenner · Executive Director Obesity Health Alliance 1
Lauren Bowes Byatt · Deputy Director (healthy life mission) Nesta 1
Liz Fox · National Sustainability Director aldi 1
Michael Baber · Director Health Action Research Group 1
Natasha Burgon · Director of Health Improvement Department of Health and Social Care 1
Neha Ramaiya · Lead Clinical Advisor General Pharmaceutical Council (GPhC) 1
Nika Pajda · Head of Policy and Research Bite Back 1
Nilani Sritharan · Head of Healthy and Sustainable Diets Sainsbury’s 1
Oonagh Turnbull · Head of Health and Sustainable Diets Campaigns Tesco 1
Prof Aidan Fowler · National Director of Patient Safety and Deputy National Medical Director NHS England 1
Professor Chris van Tulleken · Professor of Infection and Global Health University College London 1
Professor Christina Vogel · Director Centre for Food Policy, City St George's, University of London 1
Professor Roy Taylor · Principal Investigator DiRECT Study 1
Professor Susan Jebb · Professor of Diet and Population Health Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences at the University of Oxford 1
Sharon Hodgson MP · Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Public Health and Prevention Department of Health and Social Care 1

Correspondence

18 letters

On smaller screens, scroll horizontally to read every column. Keyboard users can focus the table region and use the arrow keys.

PublishedDirectionLetter
13 Oct 2026 Not recorded Correspondence from the MHRA- Illegal medicines trade GLP-1s
9 Sep 2026 Not recorded Correspondence to DHSC and DoE- ENHANCE
2 Sep 2026 Not recorded Correspondence from joint coalition of written evidence submitters- Food Management Report
28 Apr 2026 Not recorded Correspondence from the MHRA- Follow up from 25 March session
25 Mar 2026 Not recorded Correspondence from Sainsbury’s- Follow up from 28 Jan session
11 Mar 2026 Not recorded Correspondence from Aldi- Follow up on 28 Jan session
11 Mar 2026 Not recorded Correspondence from Tesco- Follow up on 28 Jan session
11 Mar 2026 Not recorded Correspondence form Asda- Follow up on 28 Jan session
25 Feb 2026 Not recorded Correspondence from the Food and Drink Federation- follow up from 3 December session
4 Feb 2026 Not recorded Correspondence from the Minister of State for Health - UK Nutrient Profiling Model 2018
4 Feb 2026 Not recorded Correspondence from Domino's - Right to Reply
28 Jan 2026 Not recorded Correspondence from Advertising Standards Authority- Update on weight loss prescription only medicines
21 Jan 2026 Not recorded Correspondence from UK Hospitality- Follow up from 3 Dec session
17 Dec 2025 Not recorded Correspondence from the Advertising Standards Authority- Tackling misleading health information in advertising
26 Nov 2025 Not recorded Correspondence from KFC re Right to reply following 15 Oct session
19 Nov 2025 Not recorded Correspondence from Asda re Food and Weight Management Inquiry
12 Nov 2025 Not recorded Correspondence from Global re right to reply following 8 October evidence session
15 Oct 2025 Not recorded Correspondence from Minister Dalton re Food and drink advertising regulations