View The University of Strathclyde scorecard
Ms C complained that the university had failed to take into account all relevant information during the appeals process. Having reviewed the evidence, we were satisfied that all of the evidence was considered in line with university procedures during the appeals process. We did not uphold Ms C's complaint.
View Decision Report 201809040 as a PDF (23.44 KB) Updated: August 21, 2019
| Reference | Date | Summary | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| 201804862 | 01 Jun 2020 | Mr C complained that the university had failed to take reasonable action to inform students of class cancellations and failed … | Not Upheld |
| 201801384 | 01 Jan 2019 | Mr C complained that the university failed to take reasonable account of his disabilities in terms of the the impact … | Not Upheld |
| 201705948 | 01 Nov 2018 | Mr C complained that his postgraduate supervisors failed to follow relevant policy or procedure in relation to his supervision, and … | Not Upheld |
| 201704550 | 01 Sep 2018 | Mr C complained about his university’s handling of a personal circumstances application and academic appeals. Mr C said there had … | Not Upheld |
| 201602543 | 01 Apr 2018 | Mr C was required to withdraw from his course and, despite him no longer being a student at the university, … | Not Upheld |