Source · SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman)

Borders NHS Board

SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman) Upheld Reference 201609377 Sector Health Category clinical treatment / diagnosis Decided 01 May 2018

View NHS Borders scorecard

Full decision

Summary

Mr C complained on behalf of his partner (Ms A) about the care and treatment Ms A received following an operation to her knee at Borders General Hospital. Ms A had been admitted for a planned day surgery but was kept in overnight for observation. In particular, Mr C complained that the board had failed to exercise proper care and attention to Ms A immediately after her operation, as no doctor or consultant saw her prior to discharge despite Ms A having been admitted overnight. He was also concerned that Ms A was advised to fully weight-bear following the operation.

We took independent advice from a consultant orthopaedic surgeon and a nursing adviser. The consultant orthopaedic surgeon indicated that, while there are a number of published protocols recommending non weight-bearing initially, the surgeon performing the operation was best placed to judge this, and that in this case the surgeon's recommendation to weight-bear was reasonable.

We were concerned about the lack of communication with Ms A during her overnight stay in the hospital, which the board had accepted and had apologised for. The advice we received from the consultant orthopaedic surgeon was that the delay in communicating Ms A's surgery details would not have an adverse impact of her prognosis. However, we considered that it would have been in line with established practice for Ms A to have been seen on a post-operative ward round during her hospital stay.

We also found that a hand-written operation note was inadequate in that it lacked detail, but we noted that Ms A had been managed in line with the post-operative instructions contained in the hand written note. Both the consultant orthopaedic surgeon and the nursing adviser were of the view that the overall the care and treatment Ms A had received had been reasonable. However, given our concerns about the lack of a post-operative ward round, the lack of detail in the hand written operation note and the lack of communication with Ms A, we upheld Mr C's complaint.

Recommendations

What we said should change to put things right in future: A post-operative ward round should be part of routine surgical care.

Post-operation instructions should contain adequate detail to allow the transfer of information.

We have asked the organisation to provide us with evidence that they have implemented the recommendations we have made on this case by the deadline we set.

Related reading

View Decision Report 201609377 as a PDF (13.11 KB) Updated: December 2, 2018

View original on SPSO (Scottish Publ… website

Other decisions involving Borders NHS Board

Reference Date Summary Outcome
202311847 01 Jun 2026 C complained about the care and treatment provided to their late spouse (A) by the board. A, who suffered from … Not Upheld
202311156 01 Jan 2026 C broke their leg and underwent an operation. Following a scan the next day, C was told that the results … Upheld
202402836 01 Aug 2025 C complained about the lack of care and understanding for their parent (A) who died in hospital. C referred to … Resolved / Early Resolution
202210447 01 Dec 2024 C complained about the care and treatment provided to their friend (A) when they were admitted to hospital. A was … Not Upheld
202304694 01 Nov 2024 C complained on behalf of their parent (A). A had a long history of contact with mental health services at … Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation