Source · SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman)

A Dentist in the Fife NHS Board area

SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman) Not Upheld Reference 201604307 Sector Health Category clinical treatment / diagnosis Decided 01 April 2017

Full decision

Summary

On attending his dentist, Mr C was noted to have dental decay in two of his teeth. It was agreed that this would be removed and his teeth would be filled. Despite this, Mr C remained in pain and he required root canal treatment. The treatment and known risks of such treatment were explained. Mr C experienced one of these risks in that a file broke during treatment and was required to be left in his root canal. Mr C's treatment was completed but he remained in pain.

Mr C complained that he did not receive appropriate or reasonable treatment. We took independent dentistry advice. We found that while it was regrettable that the instrument broke, this was not indicative of poor treatment and was a known risk, as was the possibility of continuing pain. We therefore did not uphold Mr C's complaint.

Related reading

View Decision Report 201604307 as a PDF (10.97 KB) Updated: March 13, 2018

View original on SPSO (Scottish Publ… website

Other decisions involving A Dentist in the Fife NHS Board area

Reference Date Summary Outcome
201805288 01 Mar 2019 Ms C complained to us about the treatment she received from her dentist. She said that the dentist had damaged … Not Upheld
201404965 01 Oct 2015 Mr C raised concerns about the care and treatment he received when he attended the practice in 2014. In particular, … Upheld
201406135 01 Oct 2015 Mr C had treatment to extract two teeth. Immediately after the treatment, he complained about the treatment received and that … Partly Upheld
201304619 01 Dec 2014 Mr C visited his dentist because he had toothache. The dentist found an abscess that was discharging pus from the … Partly Upheld
201301837 01 May 2014 Mr C complained that he had been inappropriately treated by his dentist. He was unhappy with the insertion of two … Not Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation