Source · SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman)

A Dentist in the Fife NHS Board area

SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman) Partly Upheld Reference 201406135 Sector Health Category clinical treatment / diagnosis Decided 01 October 2015

Full decision

Summary

Mr C had treatment to extract two teeth. Immediately after the treatment, he complained about the treatment received and that the dentist had failed to take reasonable account of his hearing condition. He complained that his dentist took too long to carry out the extractions and that he did not appear able to carry out the extractions. He also said that he had advised his dentist of his need to lip read in order to fully understand what was being said to him. However, during the procedure, the dentist had continued to speak to him with a mask on.

We took independent advice from our dental adviser, who said that the treatment Mr C received was reasonable and appropriate and that, while the extractions had taken some time, this was reasonable in this case. Our adviser explained that guidance issued by Health Protection Scotland requires dentists to wear full personal protection equipment (PPE), including a mask, during any operative procedure. As such, he considered that it would not have been reasonable to expect the dentist to repeatedly stop the procedure and remove his mask to speak to the patient. This would have required the dentist to remove his PPE, undertake hand hygiene and put on new PPE on each occasion that he stopped to speak to the patient. However, we were mindful of Fife NHS Board's advice that requires staff to respect disabilities. We considered that, in the circumstances, consideration should have been given to offering Mr C the services of an advocate/translator/interpreter or similar. This would have ensured that he fully understood what was being said to him during the procedure.

Recommendations

We recommended that the dentist: reflect on this case to guide future practice to ensure that a patient's communication needs are being met. In particular, that in a similar situation consideration should be given to offering a patient the services of an advocate/translator/interpreter or similar who could speak to the patient without wearing a mask.

Related reading

View Decision Report 201406135 as a PDF (12.47 KB) Updated: March 13, 2018

View original on SPSO (Scottish Publ… website

Other decisions involving A Dentist in the Fife NHS Board area

Reference Date Summary Outcome
201805288 01 Mar 2019 Ms C complained to us about the treatment she received from her dentist. She said that the dentist had damaged … Not Upheld
201604307 01 Apr 2017 On attending his dentist, Mr C was noted to have dental decay in two of his teeth. It was agreed … Not Upheld
201404965 01 Oct 2015 Mr C raised concerns about the care and treatment he received when he attended the practice in 2014. In particular, … Upheld
201304619 01 Dec 2014 Mr C visited his dentist because he had toothache. The dentist found an abscess that was discharging pus from the … Partly Upheld
201301837 01 May 2014 Mr C complained that he had been inappropriately treated by his dentist. He was unhappy with the insertion of two … Not Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation