Source · SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman)

Grampian NHS Board

SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman) Upheld Reference 201401556 Sector Health Category communication / staff attitude / dignity / confidentiality Decided 01 October 2014

View NHS Grampian scorecard

Full decision

Summary

Ms C and her partner (Mr C) complained to us about the failures in communication from staff at Aberdeen Maternity Hospital following the death of their baby. The failures included a lack of postnatal checks; being given a damaged keepsake memory box; a failure to inform their GP of the circumstances; appointment letters for baby checks sent following the baby's death; and delayed contact by the community obstetric team.

The board had apologised to Ms C and Mr C and had taken action in an effort to prevent a repeat occurrence happening to another family. We gave the case considerable consideration and upheld the complaint. However, we were satisfied that as the board had apologised and had taken appropriate action following the complaint by amending procedures, no additional recommendations were required.

Related reading

View Decision Report 201401556 as a PDF (11.01 KB) Updated: March 13, 2018

View original on SPSO (Scottish Publ… website

Other decisions involving Grampian NHS Board

Reference Date Summary Outcome
202504517 01 May 2026 C complained about the care and treatment that they received in A&E, and the subsequent handling of their complaint by … Upheld
202401974 01 May 2026 C complained about the standard of care provided to their parent (A) by the board in relation to a scan … Upheld
202501264 01 Mar 2026 C complained about the care and treatment that their spouse (A) received from the board during admissions to Dr Gray’s … Upheld
202402498 01 Sep 2025 C complained that the board failed to carry out their sibling (A)'s hip replacement surgery within a reasonable time. C … Upheld
202305315 01 Aug 2025 C, a Patient Advice and Support Service (PASS) adviser, complained on behalf of their client (B) about the care and … Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation