Source · SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman)

A Dentist in the Greater Glasgow and Clyde NHS Board area

SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman) Upheld Reference 201201761 Sector Health Category clinical treatment / diagnosis Decided 01 June 2013

Full decision

Summary

Mr C complained about root canal treatment that he had received. He told us that after it he was left with periodic pain for two years, and that he had to pay for corrective work to be carried out by a new dentist.

After taking independent advice from a dental adviser, we upheld Mr C's complaint. Our investigation found that the standard of treatment he received was inadequate. The adviser said that an x-ray taken after the treatment showed that the dentist had not completely filled the root canal, leaving space that could then act as a possible further source of infection, and that led to Mr C's problems. We also found that there was a lack of information in the dental records and no record of any discussion with Mr C of the options, risks or warnings given in advance of treatment. In addition, there was no evidence that x-rays taken had been graded or that any report on the x-rays was written.

Recommendations

We recommended that the dentist: apologise to Mr C for the failings identified in this case; refund the cost of treatment required by Mr C from another dental practice; ensure that dental records are in accordance with General Dental Council standards; and provide the Ombudsman with an undertaking that she would address the concerns raised in this complaint through her continuing professional development.

Related reading

View Decision Report 201201761 as a PDF (11.37 KB) Updated: March 13, 2018

View original on SPSO (Scottish Publ… website

Other decisions involving A Dentist in the Greater Glasgow and Cl…

Reference Date Summary Outcome
202501635 01 Jun 2026 C complained about the dental treatment provided to their adult child (A). C said that A requested a replacement upper … Upheld
201810422 01 Aug 2019 Mr C complained about the dental treatment which his wife (Mrs A) received from her dentist. The dentist that examined … Not Upheld
201704207 01 Aug 2018 Mr and Mrs C complained on behalf of their daughter (Ms A) about the orthodontic treatment (a speciality field of … Partly Upheld
201704505 01 Apr 2018 Mr C complained that his dentist had failed to provide him with appropriate dental treatment. In particular Mr C felt … Not Upheld
201608924 01 Nov 2017 Miss C complained about the treatment that she received from her dentist, after they removed one of her teeth. She … Partly Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation