Source · SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman)

A Dentist in the Greater Glasgow and Clyde NHS Board area

SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman) Not Upheld Reference 201810422 Sector Health Category clinical treatment / diagnosis Decided 01 August 2019

Full decision

Summary

Mr C complained about the dental treatment which his wife (Mrs A) received from her dentist. The dentist that examined Mrs A had said that there was decay in one of her teeth and that the existing crown should be removed; the decay treated; and a new crown fitted. An estimate was given for the potential costs of the treatment and/or crown, either on the NHS or as a private patient. Mrs A decided to take time to think about the matter and in the interim she increased her dental insurance cover should she have to pay a higher cost for the replacement crown. Mrs A then attended another dentist who said that there was no decay and that remedial work was not required. Mr C felt that the dentist was wrong to state that the tooth had decay and needed treatment, and as a result Mrs A had incurred extra costs.

We took independent advice from a dentist. We found that the dental treatment Mrs A received was reasonable and in line with accepted practice. Dental radiographs confirmed that there was decay in the tooth and that the existing crown did require to be removed to allow the decay to be treated. A new crown would then be required. We did not uphold the complaint.

Related reading

View Decision Report 201810422 as a PDF (23.9 KB) Updated: August 21, 2019

View original on SPSO (Scottish Publ… website

Other decisions involving A Dentist in the Greater Glasgow and Cl…

Reference Date Summary Outcome
202501635 01 Jun 2026 C complained about the dental treatment provided to their adult child (A). C said that A requested a replacement upper … Upheld
201704207 01 Aug 2018 Mr and Mrs C complained on behalf of their daughter (Ms A) about the orthodontic treatment (a speciality field of … Partly Upheld
201704505 01 Apr 2018 Mr C complained that his dentist had failed to provide him with appropriate dental treatment. In particular Mr C felt … Not Upheld
201608924 01 Nov 2017 Miss C complained about the treatment that she received from her dentist, after they removed one of her teeth. She … Partly Upheld
201506142 01 May 2016 Mr C complained about how his new dentist communicated with him after taking over his care. He was also concerned … Partly Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation