Source · SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman)

Orkney Islands Council

SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman) Upheld Reference 201201680 Sector Local Government Category repairs and maintenance of housing stock (incl dampness and infestations) Decided 01 January 2013

View Orkney Islands Council scorecard

Full decision

Summary

After moving into a council property, Mr A told the council that water was coming in at the front door and there was mould growing in the bathroom. The council arranged to paint the bathroom but the mould problems continued, and the front door leak was not repaired. Mr A submitted a formal complaint and also raised concerns about draughts and condensation in the bedrooms. He said that this had forced him to sleep in the lounge area and that the problems with dampness, mould and drafts had had an adverse impact on his health.

Mr A was re-housed within two days of submitting his complaint to the council and, in formally responding to the complaint, they acknowledged that they had not followed their normal process in dealing with the repairs. They apologised for the inconvenience, undertook to speak to staff to avoid similar future problems, and compensated Mr A for damaged possessions and mail items. Mr A was not satisfied with this and requested that his rent payments be refunded. The council did not consider this appropriate as, in their view, Mr A had also contributed to the problem by failing to adequately heat and ventilate the property.

Miss C, an advice worker, complained to us on behalf of Mr A that the council had failed to reasonably address the problems with the property and failed to acknowledged that the problems were there before Mr A's tenancy started. To support this, she provided a letter from a previous tenant who said that he had also told the council about problems of water coming in and mould growth. Our enquiries revealed that required repair work, identified before the departure of the previous tenant, was not carried out before Mr A started his tenancy. We also found that the council should have carried out an inspection between tenancies, but this was not done. We noted that the council had then been slow to respond to repair requests by Mr A and that the required repair to the front door was not carried out at all during his tenancy. We, therefore, upheld the complaint. However, we noted that the council had already acknowledged their failings and taken what we considered to be reasonable steps to address these, and we did not find it necessary to make any recommendations.

Related reading

View Decision Report 201201680 as a PDF (11.77 KB) Updated: March 13, 2018

View original on SPSO (Scottish Publ… website

Other decisions involving Orkney Islands Council

Reference Date Summary Outcome
201807697 01 Jul 2020 Mr C complained that the council had failed to produce accurate reports for various planning applications. He also believed that … Not Upheld
201608133 01 Oct 2017 Mrs C, who has multiple sclerosis (MS) and cognitive/mental health difficulties, said that the council failed to take these matters … Not Upheld
201302135 01 Apr 2014 Mr C complained that the council had decided to relocate a disabled parking space to a position further from his … Not Upheld
201203213 01 Jan 2014 Mr C raised a number of issues about the adequacy of consultation about a review of a particular water management … Not Upheld
201201215 01 Jan 2013 Mr and Mrs C have a teenage son with a disability. They were unhappy with the council’s handling of an … Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation