Source · SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman)

The Highland Council

SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman) Partly Upheld Reference 201103935 Sector Local Government Category road authority as developer, road alterations Decided 01 November 2012

View The Highland Council scorecard

Full decision

Summary

Mr C complained about the council's handling of planning proposals for a new academic campus some distance from his home. A council committee granted planning approval in principle in May 2010 although the consent was not issued until March 2011. An initial application for consent for 'matters specified in conditions' was submitted in June 2011 and that formed the main basis of Mr C's four complaints. (Such applications relate to conditions attached to planning permissions in principle which require the further approval, consent or agreement of the planning authority for any detailed aspect of the development.)

Mr C complained that the council provided inaccurate and misleading information about access arrangements to the campus; a council officer failed to remain impartial when providing advice to a councillor and acted unreasonably by failing to respond to Mr C's letter, and the chief executive failed to respond to Mr C's letter of complaint within a reasonable time scale.

Our investigation found that the council conceded that the report on the first 'matters specified in conditions' application could have been clearer. It was not, however, acted on. The matter was put to the relevant council committee and continued, when it was re-presented in an amended form and considered along with a second 'matters specified in conditions' application. Both applications were approved. As we found no evidence of maladministration we did not uphold this complaint. Nor did we uphold the complaints about the council officer. We found no evidence to suggest that she was not impartial in giving professional advice to the councillor, and while Mr C provided evidence that he had emailed a letter to her, we could not independently confirm that she had received it. We did, however, uphold the complaint about the chief executive's response, as he accepted that it had been delayed. We did not make any recommendations as he had already apologised to Mr C for this.

Related reading

View Decision Report 201103935 as a PDF (11.62 KB) Updated: March 13, 2018

View original on SPSO (Scottish Publ… website

Other decisions involving The Highland Council

Reference Date Summary Outcome
202206966 01 Apr 2024 C was living in a residential unit for young people who are looked after by the council. C complained that … Partly Upheld
202107467 01 Dec 2023 C complained about the council’s handling of allegations that their child made against them, including decisions taken to remove their … Partly Upheld
202002615 01 Apr 2023 C complained about the council’s decision-making in relation to the allocation of Scottish Government Town Centre funding. In terms of … Upheld
201909583 01 May 2021 C complained about the council's social work department's handling of child protection concerns that were raised about their children and … Upheld
201810255 01 Jan 2021 C complained about the council's involvement in respect of the Welfare Guardianship Order (order which allows someone to make ongoing … Not Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation