Source · SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman)

Lothian NHS Board

SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman) Not Upheld Reference 201003865 Sector Health Category policy/administration Decided 01 September 2011

View NHS Lothian scorecard

Full decision

Summary

Mrs C entered into an agreement with the board for IVF treatment in accordance with the criteria in place at that time. She waited from December 2008 until 2010 to reach within the top places on the waiting list, however by that time the board’s IVF treatment policy had changed. Ms C said that this policy change (reducing the number of rounds of treatment) had disadvantaged her and should not have applied to her.

Our investigation found that although Mrs C was on the IVF programme pathway, she been told of the policy change before her actual IVF treatment had started. Furthermore we did not have the authority to intervene in professionally based medical judgements coupled with funding issues.

We noted that before Mrs C brought her complaint to us the board had apologised to her for a delay in formally informing her of the policy change.

Related reading

View Decision Report 201003865 as a PDF (13.91 KB) Updated: March 13, 2018

View original on SPSO (Scottish Publ… website

Other decisions involving Lothian NHS Board

Reference Date Summary Outcome
202404449 01 Jan 2026 C complained about the care that their adult child (A) received from the prison healthcare team and particularly a failure … Upheld
202304800 01 Mar 2025 C complained that the board failed to provide reasonable personal care and treatment to their sibling (A). A was admitted … Upheld
202304367 01 Dec 2024 C complained on behalf of their spouse (A) about the standard of care and treatment received in the months before … Partly Upheld
202005296 01 May 2022 C complained that there had been an unreasonable delay in their late parent (A) receiving a prescription of antibiotics following … Upheld
202002582 01 Jan 2021 C complained about the clinical care provided to their child (A) by the board, specifically, that a Chiari malformation (where … Not Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation