Source · LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman)

London Borough of Havering

LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman) Upheld Reference 25-027-504 Sector Transport And Highways Category Parking And Other Penalties Decided 12 March 2026

View London Borough of Havering scorecard

Full decision

The Ombudsman's final decision

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s handling of a penalty charge notice. This is because the Council has agreed to cancel the notice and this provides a suitable remedy for the complaint.

The complaint

Mr X complains the Council did not send him a copy of a penalty charge notice (PCN) by post and ignored his challenge and request for video footage of the PCN. The Council then escalated the case and told him it was too late to challenge the PCN. He says this caused him stress and worry and he wants the Council to either cancel the PCN or take the process back to an earlier stage so he may challenge it.

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word fault to refer to these. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we are satisfied with the actions an organisation has taken or proposes to take. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(7), as amended)

How I considered this complaint

I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council.

I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

My assessment

In response to Mr X’s complaint the Council has now cancelled the PCN and confirmed it will take no further action in respect of it. This is the best outcome Mr X could have hoped for when trying to challenge it.

I appreciate Mr X has suffered some inconvenience and frustration but I am mindful the Council has exercised its discretion to cancel the PCN outside the statutory process when it could have decided to escalate it further. This would then have put Mr X to additional effort to challenge the escalation and, if successful the PCN itself, while removing our jurisdiction to consider the matter. I am therefore satisfied the cancellation provides a suitable remedy for Mr X in this case.

Final decision

We will not investigate this complaint. This is because the Council’s cancellation of the PCN provides a suitable remedy for Mr X.

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

View original on LGO (Local Governme… website

Other decisions involving London Borough of Havering

Reference Date Summary Outcome
25-021-940 Other
25-025-182 Other
25-022-907 Other
25-015-474 Other
25-021-052 Other
View all decisions for this organisation