Source · LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman)

Middlesbrough Borough Council

LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman) Other Reference 25-016-587 Sector Planning Category Planning Advice Decided 10 March 2026

View Middlesbrough Council scorecard

Full decision

The Ombudsman's final decision

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about planning advice. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify an investigation.

The complaint

Mr X complains he asked the Council what permissions he needed to build an outbuilding in his garden. The Council told him he did not need planning permission for the size of building he proposed if it was no higher than 2.5 metres. Mr X says the Council should have told him he may need to consider building regulations.

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

How I considered this complaint

I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.

I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

My assessment

In 2024, Mr X decided to build a gym in his garden. He emailed the Council to ask what permission he needed. The Council said it would be permitted development if it was no more than 2.5 metres high.

Mr X began building works. In September 2025, the Council saw the building works and wrote to him the following day telling him it was unauthorised with respect to building regulations. It explained that planning permission differs from building regulations. It said the planning officer told Mr X he did not need planning permission but did not state he did not need to comply with building regulations.

It was Mr X’s responsibility to check carefully whether building regulations were required before starting an expensive building project. There is not enough evidence of fault in the Council’s consideration of the matter to justify an investigation by the Ombudsman.

Final decision

We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault in the Council’s actions.

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

View original on LGO (Local Governme… website

Other decisions involving Middlesbrough Borough Council

Reference Date Summary Outcome
25-014-970 Other
24-020-692 Other
25-012-495 Other
25-013-902 28 Jun 2026 There was fault by the Council. The planning report for a planning application for a petrol filling station failed to … Upheld
25-023-056 25 Jun 2026 We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s handling of disabled parking provision at an event. This is because … Other
View all decisions for this organisation