Source · LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman)

High Peak Borough Council

LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman) Other Reference 25-015-514 Sector Other Categories Category Councillor Conduct And Standards Decided 11 March 2026

View High Peak Borough Council scorecard

Full decision

The Ombudsman's final decision

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision on a councillor conduct complaint as it is unlikely we will find fault in the way the Council considered the matter.

The complaint

Mr X complains the Council failed to properly consider his complaint that a councillor had breached the Council’s code of conduct when they started unfounded disciplinary proceedings against him in his role as chairman of a local community group.

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B)) We consider whether there was fault in the way an organisation made its decision. If there was no fault in how the organisation made its decision, we cannot question the outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)

How I considered this complaint

I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council.

I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

My assessment

The Council assessed Mr X’s complaint. It acknowledged the councillor had used their Council email address. However it decided not to investigate as, in its view, the councillor was not acting in their official capacity as an elected member of the Council when the alleged breach of the code took place. Therefore, it decided the code of conduct was not engaged.

I recognise Mr X disagrees with the Council’s view and has strong feelings about the actions of the councillor. But the Council is entitled to reach the decision it did, and it is in line with its complaint policy. We could only be critical of the decision if there was evidence of fault in the way it was made; I have not seen such evidence.

Final decision

We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because we are unlikely to find fault in the Council’s actions.

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

View original on LGO (Local Governme… website

Other decisions involving High Peak Borough Council

Reference Date Summary Outcome
25-020-769 Other
25-016-229 Other
26-004-996 03 Jun 2026 We will not investigate this complaint about the Council charging residents to collect garden waste. This is because there is … Other
25-011-695 19 Dec 2025 Summary: We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint about the Council’s handling of her council tax debt. This is because … Other
25-013-815 02 Dec 2025 Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision not to honour the original rate Mr X was … Other
View all decisions for this organisation