Source · LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman)

London Borough of Hillingdon

LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman) Other Reference 25-015-099 Sector Environment And Regulation Category Antisocial Behaviour Decided 17 March 2026

View Hillingdon Council scorecard

Full decision

on the lessons that can be learnt from our complaints about end of life care given in care homes and in the home.

Category : Environment and regulation > Antisocial behaviour Decision : Closed after initial enquiries Decision date : 17 Mar 2026 The complaint

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

How I considered this complaint

My assessment

Final decision

The Ombudsman's final decision

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s management of Mr X’s community trigger application. This is because an investigation would be unlikely to result in finding fault with the Council’s actions.

The complaint

Mr X complained the Council mishandled his community trigger application.

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

How I considered this complaint

I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council.

I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

My assessment

Mr X complained the Council mishandled his community trigger application after he reported three incidents of anti-social behaviour within 6 months.

The Council told Mr X the events complained about did not meet the threshold for a community trigger, but it had sent a leaflet out to local residents to help address the issues he was experiencing.

Mr X is unhappy with the Council’s decision and wants us to find it at fault. The evidence shows the Council has considered Mr X’s application and decided his reports do not meet the threshold for a community trigger review. The Council is entitled to make this decision. There is no evidence of fault in the Council’s decision making. An investigation would therefore be unlikely to result in a finding of fault on the Council’s part.

Final decision

We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because an investigation would be unlikely to find fault with the Council’s actions.

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

View original on LGO (Local Governme… website

Other decisions involving London Borough of Hillingdon

Reference Date Summary Outcome
25-002-684 Upheld
25-012-883 Other
25-014-173 Other
25-012-146 Other
25-014-223 Other
View all decisions for this organisation