Source · LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman)

West Lancashire Borough Council

LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman) Upheld Reference 25-014-329 Sector Environment And Regulation Category Other Decided 04 March 2026

View West Lancashire Borough Council scorecard

Full decision

The Ombudsman's final decision

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s Environmental Health Service. This is because the Council already remedied the injustice during its complaint process, and there is a body better placed to consider Miss X’s complaint.

The complaint

Miss X complained about the Council’s investigation into the heating issues at the property she was living in.

She says the Council did not inspect her property, and there was delay and poor communication.

Miss X would like compensation for the distress caused by lack of heating.

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide we cannot achieve the outcome someone wants, or there is another body better placed to consider this complaint. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B)) If we are satisfied with an organisation’s actions or proposed actions, we can complete our investigation and issue a decision statement. (Local Government Act 1974, section 30(1B) and s34H(1), as amended) The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)

How I considered this complaint

I considered information provided by Miss X and the Council.

I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

My assessment

Miss X first complained to the landlord and letting agent about heating issues, then in the final months of her tenancy complained to the Council.

In the complaint response the Council apologised, saying there were delays in its investigation, and communication could have been better. This is a reasonable and proportionate remedy for the injustice Miss X suffered.

Miss X would like compensation for the ill health and distress she suffered due to the lack of heating, and for travel expenses. These are matters which backdate her complaint to the Council. She is pursuing this with the letting agent and courts, which is reasonable for her to do. This is not something the Council or Ombudsman can consider.

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

View original on LGO (Local Governme… website

Other decisions involving West Lancashire Borough Council

Reference Date Summary Outcome
25-019-616 Other
25-016-511 Upheld
25-010-672 Other
25-011-578 20 Nov 2025 Summary: We cannot investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s decision to approve a planning application. This is because this … Other
24-020-724 06 Nov 2025 Summary: There was no fault in the way the Council handled Miss X’s reports of noise, security risk and antisocial … Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation