Source · LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman)

London Borough of Harrow

LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman) Upheld Reference 25-014-208 Sector Children S Care Services Category Other Decided 27 October 2025

View Harrow Council scorecard

Full decision

e have upheld Mr X’s complaint because the Council delayed considering his complaint at stage two of the children’s statutory complaints procedure. The Council has agreed to resolve the complaint early by providing a proportionate remedy for the injustice caused to Mr X.

The complaint

Mr X complains about the actions of the Council’s children’s services and its involvement with his family. Mr X asked the Ombudsman to intervene after he did not receive a stage two response to his complaint.

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word fault to refer to these. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we are satisfied with the actions an organisation has taken or proposes to take. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(7), as amended) Under our information sharing agreement, we will share this decision with the Office for Standards in Education, Children’s Services and Skills (Ofsted).

How I considered this complaint

I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.

I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

My assessment

The Council is considering Mr X’s complaint under the statutory children’s complaints procedure. At this stage of the procedure, councils appoint an investigator and an independent person who is responsible for overseeing the investigation. Councils have up to 13 weeks to complete stage two of the process from the date of request.

If we were to investigate this complaint, it is likely we would find the Council at fault. This is because there has been a delay in the Council allocating Mr X’s complaint to the investigation team and issuing Mr X with a stage two response. This has caused Mr X frustration in the form of uncertainty and frustration.

We therefore asked the Council to apologise to Mr X for the delay and offer to make a payment to him of £200 to remedy the distress this caused. To its credit, the Council agreed.

Final decision

We have upheld this complaint. The Council has agreed to resolve the complaint early by providing an appropriate remedy.

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

View original on LGO (Local Governme… website

Other decisions involving London Borough of Harrow

Reference Date Summary Outcome
25-021-254 Other
25-024-420 Other
25-012-969 Other
25-024-133 Other
25-021-194 Other
View all decisions for this organisation