LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman) decision

Seaham Care Limited

Decided 11 August 2026 Reference 25-012-758 Outcome: Upheld Sector: Adult Care Services Category: Charging

Full decision

Decision (the LGO's words)

The Ombudsman's final decision

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint that the Care Provider failed to repay an overpayment it owed Mrs Z. The Provider repaid the money during our investigation. Further investigation would achieve nothing worthwhile.

The complaint

Ms X complains the Care Provider failed to repay money it owed Mrs Z.

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is no worthwhile outcome achievable by our investigation. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

How I considered this complaint

I considered information provided by the complainant and the Care Provider.

I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

My assessment

During our investigation, the Care Provider refunded the money Mrs Z had overpaid. Therefore, we will not investigate further because there is no worthwhile outcome achievable.

Final decision

We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because there is no worthwhile outcome achievable by our investigation.

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

From: LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman), decision 25-012-758, 11 August 2026