Source · LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman)

Gateshead Metropolitan Borough Council

LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman) Other Reference 25-012-701 Sector Benefits And Tax Category Council Tax Decided 05 October 2025

View Gateshead Council scorecard

Full decision

The Ombudsman's final decision

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about Council tax reduction because there is a right of appeal to a Valuation Tribunal.

The complaint

Mr X complains that the Council wrongly refused to reduce his Council tax as they misunderstood the Council tax reduction available for disabled people.

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone has a right of appeal, reference or review to a tribunal about the same matter. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to use this right. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended) The Valuation Tribunal deals with appeals against decisions on council tax liability and council tax support or reduction.

How I considered this complaint

I considered information provided by the complainant.

I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

My assessment

Mr X says that the Council has failed to provide him with a Council tax discount for his disability. He says that he has an extra room needed for his disability.

Any dispute about discounts or exemptions for Council tax can be appealed to a Valuation Tribunal. The tribunal is an independent body which can determine any dispute about such decisions. I see no reason why an appeal could not be made in this case and so the complaint is out of jurisdiction.

Final decision

We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because he has a right of appeal to a Valuation Tribunal.

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

View original on LGO (Local Governme… website

Other decisions involving Gateshead Metropolitan Borough Council

Reference Date Summary Outcome
25-002-593 Upheld
25-001-299 Not Upheld
25-017-766 Other
25-011-299 Other
25-015-362 Other
View all decisions for this organisation