Source · LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman)

Maidstone Borough Council

LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman) Other Reference 25-012-403 Sector Other Categories Category Leisure And Culture Decided 23 October 2025

View Maidstone Borough Council scorecard

Full decision

The Ombudsman's final decision

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about events that led to him being banned from a leisure centre. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault.

The complaint

Mr X complains that he was unfairly treated by staff at a leisure centre and that this led to him being banned. Mr X also complains about how his complaints about these matters were dealt with.

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B)) If there was no fault in how the organisation made its decision, we cannot question the outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)

How I considered this complaint

I considered information provided by the complainant.

I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

My assessment

The Council’s leisure centre received concerns regarding Mr X’s behaviour from other members. Management met with Mr X to discuss the concerns. The manager subsequently reviewed CCTV footage and a record of who attended the leisure centre to satisfy itself that Mr X was in attendance at the time of one of the allegations. The leisure centre reminded Mr X of its behaviour policy.

A member of staff subsequently reported further similar concerns about Mr X’s behaviour. Mr X was subsequently banned from the leisure centre.

I will not investigate Mr X’s complaint. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault. I am satisfied that management at the leisure centre considered relevant information before warning Mr X about his behaviour and before implementing the ban and did so in line with its policy.

It is not a good use of public resources to investigate complaints about complaint procedures, if we are unable to deal with the substantive issue.

Final decision

We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is insufficient evidence of fault.

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

View original on LGO (Local Governme… website

Other decisions involving Maidstone Borough Council

Reference Date Summary Outcome
25-019-245 Other
25-010-280 Other
25-022-704 Other
24-022-332 05 Jan 2026 Summary: Mr X complained the Council failed to process his planning application properly, causing delay, distress and financial loss. We … Upheld
25-010-250 17 Dec 2025 Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about Council tax arrears. We are satisfied with the action the Council … Other
View all decisions for this organisation