Source · LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman)

Essex County Council

LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman) Other Reference 25-006-558 Sector Adult Care Services Category Transport Decided 29 July 2025

View Essex County Council scorecard

Full decision

The Ombudsman's final decision

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council considered a Blue Badge application. This is because there is no worthwhile outcome achievable.

The complaint

Mrs X complained that her Blue Badge application had been delayed due to the Council requesting further information.

Mrs X said this left her feeling distressed and worried this would delay the Council processing her application.

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is no worthwhile outcome achievable by our investigation. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

How I considered this complaint

I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.

I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

My assessment

Mrs X complained that the Council incorrectly asked her for further information for her Blue Badge application.

The Council responded to Mrs X’s complaint by confirming its reasons for requesting further information and made a decision on her application before her current Blue Badge expired.

Final decision

We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because there is no worthwhile outcome achievable.

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

View original on LGO (Local Governme… website

Other decisions involving Essex County Council

Reference Date Summary Outcome
25-030-610 Other
25-019-393 Other
25-005-994 Upheld
25-007-175 Upheld
25-016-209 Other
View all decisions for this organisation