Source · LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman)

Liverpool City Council

LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman) Other Reference 25-005-405 Sector Planning Category Other Decided 15 October 2025

View Liverpool City Council scorecard

Full decision

The Ombudsman's final decision

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a failure to respond to a complaint about unspent section 106 money and failure to respond to requests for information. We consider it reasonable to complain to the Information Commissioner’s Office. Also, further investigation will not lead to a different outcome.

The complaint

Mr X complains the Council: Failed to respond to his complaint about unspent section 106 money.

Failed to respond to freedom of information requests.

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide: further investigation would not lead to a different outcome, or there is another body better placed to consider this complaint.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B)) The Information Commissioner's Office considers complaints about freedom of information. Its decision notices may be appealed to the First Tier Tribunal (Information Rights). So, where we receive complaints about freedom of information, we normally consider it reasonable to expect the person to refer the matter to the Information Commissioner.

How I considered this complaint

I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council.

I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

My assessment

The Council has now provided a response to the complaint about unspent section 106 money. We consider further investigation of this part of the complaint will not lead to a different outcome.

It is reasonable to expect Mr X to refer this complaint about a failure to respond to requests for information to the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO). This is because this is the body with specific powers and expertise to consider the Freedom of Information Act and Environmental Information Regulations issues. The ICO has powers which the Ombudsman does not have to require compliance with the Freedom of Information Act and the Environmental Information Regulations 2004.

Final decision

We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because it is reasonable to expect him to complain to the ICO and further investigation will not lead to a different outcome.

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

View original on LGO (Local Governme… website

Other decisions involving Liverpool City Council

Reference Date Summary Outcome
25-006-111 Upheld
25-018-370 Other
25-018-875 Other
25-009-061 Other
25-024-593 Other
View all decisions for this organisation