Source · LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman)

Nottingham City Council

LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman) Other Reference 25-005-326 Sector Benefits And Tax Category Council Tax Decided 17 March 2026

View Nottingham City Council scorecard

Full decision

on the lessons that can be learnt from our complaints about end of life care given in care homes and in the home.

Category : Benefits and tax > Council tax Decision : Closed after initial enquiries Decision date : 17 Mar 2026 The complaint

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

How I considered this complaint

My assessment

Final decision

The Ombudsman's final decision

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council holding Mr X liable for unpaid council tax he says he is not responsible for, the Council failing to provide benefits Mr X says he is entitled to and failing to provide information he has requested. This is because the Valuation Tribunal and the Information Commissioner’s Office are best placed to deal with this complaint.

The complaint

Mr X complained the Council has held him liable for council tax he does not owe. He also complained the Council has failed to apply discounts to his council tax account he is entitled to and has not properly responded to his subject access request.

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is another body better placed to consider this complaint. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B)) The Valuation Tribunal deals with appeals against decisions on council tax liability and council tax support or reduction.

The Information Commissioner's Office considers complaints about freedom of information. Its decision notices may be appealed to the First Tier Tribunal (Information Rights). So where we receive complaints about freedom of information, we normally consider it reasonable to expect the person to refer the matter to the Information Commissioner.

How I considered this complaint

I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council.

I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

My assessment

Mr X complained that the Council has pursued him for unpaid council tax for periods he is not liable for. He also said the Council has failed to apply a single person discount and working tax credits to the balance it is requesting. He further complained the Council has failed to properly respond to a subject access request he has made.

The Ombudsman will not usually investigate complaints where there is another body better placed to deal with it. The Valuation Tribunal was set up to consider complaints regarding council tax liability and benefit entitlement. It would be reasonable for Mr X to refer this aspect of the complaint to the Tribunal.

The Information Commissioner’s office (ICO) was set up to consider complaints regarding information sharing and data protection. If Mr X remains unhappy with the Council’s actions, it would be reasonable for him to refer his complaint to the ICO.

Final decision

We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because the Valuation Tribunal and the Information Commissioner’s Office are best placed to deal with this complaint.

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

View original on LGO (Local Governme… website

Other decisions involving Nottingham City Council

Reference Date Summary Outcome
25-023-209 Other
25-001-569 Upheld
25-021-223 Other
25-011-897 Other
25-003-780 Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation