Source · LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman)

Nottingham City Council

LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman) Other Reference 25-003-112 Sector Transport And Highways Category Parking And Other Penalties Decided 04 June 2025

View Nottingham City Council scorecard

Full decision

The Ombudsman's final decision

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a parking penalty charge notice as Mr X can make an appeal to the Traffic Penalty Tribunal.

The complaint

Mr X complains the Council wrongly issued him with a penalty charge notice (PCN) for a parking contravention as he was unloading. Mr X wants the PCN to be cancelled.

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.

The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone has a right of appeal, reference or review to a tribunal about the same matter. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to use this right. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)

How I considered this complaint

I considered information provided by the complainant.

I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

My assessment

Parliament has provided an appeal mechanism by which Mr X can challenge the PCN, ultimately to independent adjudicators at the Traffic Penalty Tribunal (TPT). It is reasonable to expect Mr X to follow the appeal process provided in law. We are not another level of appeal and are not empowered to cancel PCNs.

For these reasons, we will not investigate.

Final decision

We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because he has the right to appeal the PCN to the TPT and it is reasonable to expect him to do so.

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

View original on LGO (Local Governme… website

Other decisions involving Nottingham City Council

Reference Date Summary Outcome
25-001-569 Upheld
25-023-209 Other
25-011-897 Other
25-023-421 Other
25-003-780 Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation