Source · LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman)

London Borough of Tower Hamlets

LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman) Other Reference 25-002-857 Sector Housing Category Allocations Decided 31 August 2025

View London Borough of Tower Hamlets scorecard

Full decision

The Ombudsman's final decision

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision about Mr X’s housing priority. There is not enough evidence of fault to justify us investigating.

The complaint

Mr X complained the Council has not considered his housing priority properly.

Mr X said the Council has not altered his banding and has not assigned him a suitable property despite being on the housing register for many years.

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide: there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

How I considered this complaint

I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council.

I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

My assessment

The Council considered Mr X’s housing priority and decided that his banding would recognise overcrowding in his home.

When responding to Mr X’s complaint, the Council confirmed that its banding decision was correct and in line with its housing allocations policy. The Council also told Mr X that there is an extreme shortage of larger properties in its area and suggested other avenues he could explore to get suitable accommodation.

I have reviewed the Council’s housing allocations policy. Mr X appears to be banded correctly for overcrowding.

The Ombudsman may not find fault with a council’s assessment of a housing applicant’s priority if it has carried this out in line with its published allocations scheme.

The Ombudsman recognises that the demand for social housing far outstrips the supply of properties in many areas. The Ombudsman may not find fault with a council for failing to re-house someone, if it has prioritised applicants and allocated properties according to its published lettings scheme policy.

Final decision

We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify us investigating.

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

View original on LGO (Local Governme… website

Other decisions involving London Borough of Tower Hamlets

Reference Date Summary Outcome
25-012-934 Other
25-012-553 Other
25-003-968 Upheld
25-009-550 Not Upheld
25-015-480 Other
View all decisions for this organisation