Source · LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman)

South Kesteven District Council

LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman) Other Reference 25-001-051 Sector Planning Category Enforcement Decided 03 September 2025

View South Kesteven District Council scorecard

Full decision

The Ombudsman's final decision

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council dealt with a possible breach of planning control. This is because we are unlikely to find fault.

The complaint

Ms X has complained about how the Council dealt with a possible breach of planning control.

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B)) We consider whether there was fault in the way an organisation made its decision. If there was no fault in how the organisation made its decision, we cannot question the outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)

How I considered this complaint

I considered information provided by Ms X and the Council.

I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

My assessment

Ms X contacted the Council as she was concerned about a local business placing an advertising sign on a footpath. Ms X says the sign blocks the path causing potential safety issues and the Council has failed to take any action to resolve the problem.

However, I am satisfied the Council properly considered Ms X’s concerns about the sign. It agreed the sign was displayed without advertising consent. It spoke to the business owner and arranged for the sign to be moved before closing its enforcement case and deciding further enforcement action was not necessary.

I understand Ms X may disagree with the Council’s decision to close its enforcement case. But it was entitled to use its professional judgment to decide formal action was not necessary. As the Council properly considered if it should take enforcement action, it is unlikely I would find fault.

Ms X says the business blocks the highway causing a hazard. But Ms X should contact the local highway authority if she is concerned about the highway being blocked.

Final decision

We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because we are unlikely to find fault by the Council.

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

View original on LGO (Local Governme… website

Other decisions involving South Kesteven District Council

Reference Date Summary Outcome
25-020-526 Other
25-014-581 Other
25-013-284 05 Jan 2026 Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a penalty charge notice. This is because Mr X has the right … Other
25-010-535 16 Dec 2025 Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council not ordering a neighbour to remove waste from their … Other
25-010-663 14 Nov 2025 Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council used its on-street video cameras. The complainant Other
View all decisions for this organisation