Source · LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman)

London Borough of Harrow

LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman) Other Reference 25-000-144 Sector Adult Care Services Category Transport Decided 01 July 2025

View Harrow Council scorecard

Full decision

The Ombudsman's final decision

Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about the Council’s decision to not issue her a Blue Badge. There is not enough evidence of fault in the Council’s decision-making process to warrant an investigation.

The complaint

Mrs X complained about the Council’s decision to not issue her a Blue Badge. She said that the Council did not consider her health needs properly. Mrs X said that she has a medical need and believed she is eligible. She would like the Council to issue a blue badge.

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

We investigate complaints of injustice caused by ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. I have used the word fault to refer to these. We consider whether there was fault in the way an organisation made its decision. If there was no fault in how the organisation made its decision, we cannot question the outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended) We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

How I considered this complaint

I considered information provided by Mrs X and the Council.

I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

My assessment

Blue Badges help people with disabilities or health conditions park closer to their destination. The Department for Transport sets out how councils should consider applications for a Blue Badge. Some people automatically qualify for a Blue Badge. Other applicants may qualify after further assessment if they have an enduring and substantial disability that means they are unable to walk, or experience very considerable difficulty when walking.

Mrs X is not automatically eligible for a Blue Badge. She applied for a Blue Badge in Spring 2025. Within her application she set out her medical conditions she believed were relevant.

The Council asked her for more information, and a face-to-face assessment took place the following month. The assessment included a walking observation and consideration of Mrs X’s medical history. The Council decided that Mrs X did not meet the eligibility for a Blue Badge.

Mrs X appealed this decision in late Spring 2025. The Council responded to the appeal to confirm that their assessment had decided that Mrs X did not meet the eligibility criteria.

Although Mrs X is unhappy with the Council’s decision, we will not investigate. The Council considered all available information, including observations of Mrs X’s mobility, medical information and her application. There is not enough evidence of fault in how it considered the blue badge application to justify our involvement.

Final decision

We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault to warrant an investigation.

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

View original on LGO (Local Governme… website

Other decisions involving London Borough of Harrow

Reference Date Summary Outcome
25-021-254 Other
25-024-420 Other
25-012-969 Other
25-024-133 Other
25-021-194 Other
View all decisions for this organisation