Source · LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman)

Transport for London

LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman) Other Reference 24-022-453 Sector Transport And Highways Category Parking And Other Penalties Decided 14 April 2025

View Transport for London scorecard

Full decision

The Ombudsman's final decision

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Authority’s decision to issue a Penalty Charge Notice. This is because it is reasonable to expect Mr X to appeal to a tribunal

The complaint

Mr X complains the Authority wrongly issued a Penalty Charge Notice (PCN).

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone has a right of appeal, reference or review to a tribunal about the same matter. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to use this right. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended) London Tribunals considers parking and moving traffic offence appeals for London.

How I considered this complaint

I considered information provided by Mr X.

I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

My assessment

I will not investigate Mr X’s complaint. This is because it is reasonable to expect Mr X to appeal to the London Tribunals if he disagrees with the Authority’s decision to issue a PCN. It is the appropriate body to consider this matter.

Final decision

We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because it is reasonable for him to appeal to the London Tribunals.

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

View original on LGO (Local Governme… website

Other decisions involving Transport for London

Reference Date Summary Outcome
25-013-058 Other
25-022-808 Other
25-022-027 Other
25-020-343 Other
25-028-120 Other
View all decisions for this organisation