Source · LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman)

City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council

LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman) Other Reference 24-014-959 Sector Environment And Regulation Category Other Decided 25 November 2024

View City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council scorecard

Full decision

The Ombudsman's final decision

Summary: We will not investigate Mr B’s complaint that his car got a puncture because the Council failed to look after a waste and recycling site. This is because the courts are in the best position to decide property damage claims and Mr B has not suffered a serious injustice which would justify our involvement.

The complaint

Mr B says his car got a puncture because the Council did not remove a screw from the parking area at a waste and recycling centre. Mr B would like the Council to reimburse his £26 repair costs.

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide: any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement, or there is another body better placed to consider this complaint.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B)) We will normally only investigate a complaint where the complainant has suffered serious loss, harm, or distress as a direct result of faults or failures. We will not normally investigate a complaint where the alleged loss or injustice is not a serious or significant matter.

How I considered this complaint

I considered information provided by Mr B.

I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

My assessment

We will not investigate this complaint.

The role of the Ombudsman is to consider complaints of administrative fault.

Property damage claims, which are about whether an organisation has been negligent, are best decided by an organisation’s insurers and if needed, the courts.

Also, Mr B’s repair costs were modest. So, Mr B has not suffered a serious or significant injustice which would justify public money being spent on an investigation or the pursuit of a financial remedy by the Ombudsman.

Final decision

For the above reasons we will not investigate this complaint.

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

View original on LGO (Local Governme… website

Other decisions involving City of Bradford Metropolitan District …

Reference Date Summary Outcome
25-030-607 Other
25-029-551 Other
25-015-846 Other
25-018-416 Other
25-006-606 Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation