Source · LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman)

London Borough of Redbridge

LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman) Upheld Reference 24-014-788 Sector Housing Category Homelessness Decided 04 August 2025

View Redbridge Council scorecard

Full decision

The Ombudsman's final decision

Summary: Miss X complained that delays by the Council when it was dealing with her homelessness application led to her incurring court costs. There was fault by the Council. The Council has agreed to pay the courts costs to remedy the injustice caused by its delay.

The complaint

The complainant, Miss X, complains the Council delayed dealing with a homelessness application. Miss X says that the delay led to her incurring court costs.

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word fault to refer to these. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint. I refer to this as ‘injustice’. If there has been fault which has caused significant injustice, or that could cause injustice to others in the future we may suggest a remedy. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26(1) and 26A(1), as amended) If we are satisfied with an organisation’s actions or proposed actions, we can complete our investigation and issue a decision statement. (Local Government Act 1974, section 30(1B) and 34H(i), as amended)

How I considered this complaint

I considered evidence provided by Miss X and the Council as well as relevant law, policy and guidance.

Miss X and the Council had an opportunity to comment on my draft decision. I considered any comments before making a final decision.

What I found

Miss X lived in a property under a licence agreement. In response to my enquiries, the Council has agreed that the housing service should have helped Miss X to find alternative accommodation sooner rather than advising her to remain in occupancy. Miss X says that this meant she incurred court costs of £5589.

The Council has said as it is reasonable to suggest it could have attempted to avoid court proceedings by acting sooner and so agrees to reimburse Miss X’s court costs. This is fault and reimbursing the court costs remedies the financial injustice to Miss X.

Action

Within one month of the date of the decision on this complaint the Council should: Pay Miss X £5589.

The Council should provide us with evidence it has complied with the above actions.

Decision I have completed my investigation and I find fault causing injustice. The Council has agreed actions to remedy injustice.

Investigator’s decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

View original on LGO (Local Governme… website

Other decisions involving London Borough of Redbridge

Reference Date Summary Outcome
25-028-046 Other
25-018-529 Other
25-015-877 Other
25-001-413 Other
25-002-357 Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation