Source · LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman)

South Kesteven District Council

LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman) Other Reference 24-013-535 Sector Planning Category Planning Applications Decided 12 December 2024

View South Kesteven District Council scorecard

Full decision

The Ombudsman's final decision

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council dealt with a planning application. This is because the complainant had the right to appeal to the Planning Inspector.

The complaint

Mr X has complained about how the Council dealt with his planning application. Mr X says the case officer was unprofessional and mishandled the application. He also says the correct processes were not followed and there were delays. Mr X says he has been caused stress and incurred additional costs because of the Council’s actions.

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.

The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone can appeal to a government minister. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to appeal. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(b), as amended) The Planning Inspector acts on behalf of the responsible Government minister. The Planning Inspector considers appeals about: Delay – usually over eight weeks – by an authority in deciding an application for planning permission A decision to refuse planning permission Conditions placed on planning permission A planning enforcement notice.

How I considered this complaint

I considered information provided by Mr X and the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

My assessment

Mr X has raised many concerns about how the Council dealt with the application and the case officer’s recommendation to refuse planning permission. However, Mr X could have appealed to the Planning Inspector after eight weeks if he was unhappy with how long it was taking the Council to determine his application. Mr X also could have chosen not to withdraw his application and instead appealed to the Inspector if permission for the development was refused.

I consider it would have been reasonable for Mr X to have used his right to appeal. The Ombudsman will not usually investigate when someone has a right to appeal to the Planning Inspector, even if the appeal would not address all the issues complained about.

Final decision

We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because he had the right to appeal to the Planning Inspector.

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

View original on LGO (Local Governme… website

Other decisions involving South Kesteven District Council

Reference Date Summary Outcome
25-020-526 Other
25-014-581 Other
25-013-284 05 Jan 2026 Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a penalty charge notice. This is because Mr X has the right … Other
25-010-535 16 Dec 2025 Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council not ordering a neighbour to remove waste from their … Other
25-010-663 14 Nov 2025 Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council used its on-street video cameras. The complainant Other
View all decisions for this organisation