Source · LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman)

London Borough of Richmond upon Thames

LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman) Other Reference 24-012-371 Sector Planning Category Other Decided 16 June 2025

View Richmond upon Thames Council scorecard

Full decision

The Ombudsman's final decision

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s refusal to allow permitted or approved development and demands the complainant provided information she does not have to progress her planning applications. She has a right to appeal to the Planning Inspector against the Council’s decision to refuse planning applications, or if it fails to determine planning applications. Also, it is reasonable to expect her to complain to the Information Commissioner with concerns about breaches of data protection regulations.

The complaint

Ms X complains that the Council: Refuses to allow permitted or approved development; Demands she provides information for her planning applications that she does not have; and Allows defamatory information about her to be posted online.

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.

The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone can appeal to a government minister. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to appeal. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(b), as amended) The Planning Inspector acts on behalf of the responsible Government minister. The Planning Inspector considers appeals about: Delay – usually over eight weeks – by an authority in deciding an application for planning permission A decision to refuse planning permission Conditions placed on planning permission A planning enforcement notice.

We normally expect someone to refer the matter to the Information Commissioner if they have a complaint about data protection. However, we may decide to investigate if we think there are good reasons. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

How I considered this complaint

I considered information provided by Ms X and the Council.

I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

My assessment

We will not consider Ms X’s complaints about the Council’s refusal to allow permitted or approved development. Or about it asking her for information she cannot provide to further her planning applications.

Ms X can appeal to the Planning Inspector against the Council’s refusal of her planning applications, or if it fails to determine her applications with relevant deadlines. She can also appeal against any Enforcement Notice she may receive. This part of her complaint is therefore outside our jurisdiction.

She further complains the Council allowed defamatory information about her to be posted online.

The Council confirmed it removed certain comments which had been posted on its planning pages about her planning applications. It also confirmed it removed her husband’s personal data. If Ms X has further concerns on this point it is reasonable to expect her to complain to the Information Commissioner’s Office which deals with complaints about data protection issues

Final decision

We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because: She has a right to appeal to the Planning Inspector against the Council’s refusal of planning applications, failure to determine planning applications and issuing of enforcement notices.

It is reasonable to expect Ms X to complain to the ICO if she considered the Council has breached its data protection regulations.

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

View original on LGO (Local Governme… website

Other decisions involving London Borough of Richmond upon Thames

Reference Date Summary Outcome
25-012-512 Other
25-022-433 Other
25-021-505 Other
25-010-305 Other
25-002-750 Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation