Source · LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman)

Mid Suffolk District Council

LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman) Other Reference 24-011-385 Sector Benefits And Tax Category Council Tax Decided 15 October 2024

View Mid Suffolk District Council scorecard

Full decision

The Ombudsman's final decision

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a Council tax premium as there is a legal remedy.

The complaint

Ms X complains about the Council’s decision to impose a premium on second homes.

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)

How I considered this complaint

I considered information provided by the complainant.

I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

My assessment

Ms X complains that the Council has imposed a Council tax premium on her second home which she considers unfair.

The Council decided to increase Council tax on second homes under Section 11A of the Local Government Act 1992 (as amended). Section 66(2) of the same Act says an individual can only challenge these decisions by a judicial review in the High Court. Because of this I cannot investigate how the Council decided this.

Final decision

We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because there is a right to take the Council to court.

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

View original on LGO (Local Governme… website

Other decisions involving Mid Suffolk District Council

Reference Date Summary Outcome
25-022-208 Other
25-020-335 Other
24-010-560 Other
25-025-994 Other
24-020-511 05 Jan 2026 Summary: We found fault on Mr Y’s complaint about the Council’s delay posting him a copy of an application form … Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation