Source · LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman)

Transport for London

LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman) Other Reference 24-011-348 Sector Transport And Highways Category Parking And Other Penalties Decided 20 October 2024

View Transport for London scorecard

Full decision

The Ombudsman's final decision

Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint that Transport for London failed to respond to her representations against a penalty charge notice. This is because it would have been reasonable for Mrs X to apply to the Traffic Enforcement Centre, which is part of Northampton County Court, to make a statutory declaration.

The complaint

The complainant, Mrs X, complains Transport for London (TfL) did not respond to her representations against a penalty charge notice (PCN).

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.

The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended) The Traffic Enforcement Centre (TEC) is part of Northampton County Court. It considers applications from local authorities to pursue payment of unpaid PCNs and from motorists to challenge local authorities’ pursuit of unpaid PCNs.

How I considered this complaint

I considered information provided by Mrs X and the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

My assessment

Where a motorist makes representations against a PCN but does not receive a response they may apply to the TEC to make a statutory declaration. If successful, the TEC may order TfL to take the process back to an earlier stage, removing the basis for any additional charges and reinstating the motorist’s right of appeal.

Mrs X confirms she received an ‘order for recovery’ from TfL and this set out her right to go to the TEC. It would therefore have been reasonable for her to make a statutory declaration if she wished to challenge TfL’s escalation of the case. The TEC’s decisions are binding on both parties and the process for making a statutory declaration is free and relatively simple to use.

Final decision

We will not investigate this complaint. This is because it would have been reasonable for Mrs X to apply to the TEC to make a statutory declaration.

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

View original on LGO (Local Governme… website

Other decisions involving Transport for London

Reference Date Summary Outcome
25-013-058 Other
25-022-808 Other
25-022-027 Other
25-020-343 Other
25-028-120 Other
View all decisions for this organisation