Source · LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman)

Environment Agency

LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman) Other Reference 24-011-182 Sector Environment And Regulation Category Trees Decided 02 December 2024

View Environment Agency scorecard

Full decision

The Ombudsman's final decision

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Authority’s failure to carry out maintenance work on private land next to Mrs X’s home. There is insufficient evidence of fault which would warrant an investigation.

The complaint

Mrs X complained about the Authority refusing to remove overgrown trees and vegetation on land adjacent to her home. She says the growth is preventing her access to the rear of her home and making it difficult to take her waste bins to the front.

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide: there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating, or we could not add to any previous investigation by the organisation, or further investigation would not lead to a different outcome.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

How I considered this complaint

I considered information provided by the complainant and the Authority.

I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

My assessment

Mrs X lives in a property joined on to other homes at either side. She says trees and vegetation have become overgrown on land at the rear of her home which she needs to access to take her waste bins round to the front for collection. She asked the Authority to carry out maintenance of the land to prevent flooding but it told her it has only responsibility for cleaning debris screens and roots from a brook which runs through the overgrown land. It does not believe the site is a significant flood risk and will not carry out additional work at public expense.

The Environment Agency is only responsible for dealing with the possibility of local flooding and in this case it has investigated Mrs X’s complaint but does not consider it can help her with the wider maintenance of the private land because there is insufficient risk of flooding from the brook and culvert.

I can find no evidence of fault on the Authority’s part. The problem with the land is a civil matter and it has no duty to maintain private land.

Final decision

We will not investigate this complaint about the Authority’s failure to carry out maintenance work on private land next to Mrs X’s home. There is insufficient evidence of fault which would warrant an investigation.

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

View original on LGO (Local Governme… website

Other decisions involving Environment Agency

Reference Date Summary Outcome
24-013-731 21 Jul 2025 Summary: Mr B complained the Environment Agency failed to maintain an existing flood protection scheme and failed to act to … Not Upheld
25-000-552 25 Jun 2025 Summary: We cannot investigate Miss X’s complaint about the Environment Agency (EA) giving her incorrect information about the flood risk … Other
24-016-384 23 Jun 2025 Summary: Mr X complains the Environment Agency (EA) failed to use their powers to clear a blockage in the River … Not Upheld
23-020-104 29 Oct 2024 Summary: Mrs B has complained that the Environment Agency has wrongly asked for an indemnity from her against the risk … Upheld
24-003-440 21 Jul 2024 Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about an alleged failure by the Authority to engage with the complainant about … Other
View all decisions for this organisation