Source · LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman)

Birmingham City Council

LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman) Other Reference 24-011-181 Sector Transport And Highways Category Parking And Other Penalties Decided 16 October 2024

View Birmingham City Council scorecard

Full decision

The Ombudsman's final decision

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s escalation of a penalty charge notice. This is because it would be reasonable for Mr X to apply to the Traffic Enforcement Centre at Northampton County Court to make a witness statement.

The complaint

The complainant, Mr X, complains the Council issued him two penalty charge notices (PCNs) for driving in the clean air zone without paying the relevant charge. He paid one of the PCNs at the discounted rate of £60 but did not receive the second. He only became aware of it when the Council escalated the case and issued him a charge certificate, increasing the amount owed to £180.

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.

The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended) The Traffic Enforcement Centre (TEC) is part of Northampton County Court. It considers applications from local authorities to pursue payment of unpaid PCNs and from motorists to challenge local authorities’ pursuit of unpaid PCNs.

How I considered this complaint

I considered information provided by Mr X and the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

My assessment

Because Mr X did not receive the second PCN he may apply to the TEC to make a (late) witness statement. The Council set out this process in its email to Mr X dated 18 September 2024 and it provides a suitable alternative remedy for the issue in this case. The process is free and relatively easy to follow and the TEC has powers to take the PCN back to an earlier stage, reducing the amount owed and reinstating Mr X’s right of appeal.

Final decision

We will not investigate this complaint. This is because it would be reasonable for Mr X to take the matter to the TEC.

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

View original on LGO (Local Governme… website

Other decisions involving Birmingham City Council

Reference Date Summary Outcome
25-003-130 Upheld
25-020-106 Other
25-020-802 Other
25-017-497 Other
24-023-024 Other
View all decisions for this organisation