Source · LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman)

Preston City Council

LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman) Other Reference 24-010-845 Sector Other Categories Category Councillor Conduct And Standards Decided 27 November 2024

View Preston City Council scorecard

Full decision

The Ombudsman's final decision

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the way the Council handled a complaint about a councillor’s behaviour. There is not enough evidence of fault by the Council.

The complaint

Ms X complained about the way the Council handled her complaint about a councillor’s conduct. Ms X says that the Councillor expressed their views relating to a neighbour dispute during a telephone call, and believes the Council incorrectly decided not to investigate this.

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

How I considered this complaint

I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.

I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

My assessment

The Ombudsman is not an appeal body. This means we do not take a second look at a decision to decide if it was wrong. Instead, we look at the processes an organisation followed to make its decision. If we consider it followed those processes correctly, we cannot question whether the decision was right or wrong, regardless of whether a complainant disagrees with the decision the organisation made.

The Council’s deputy monitoring officer considered Ms X’s complaint. They considered evidence from Ms X, consulted an independent person, and told the councillor of the complaint. The deputy monitoring officer decided the councillor was acting as a member of the public and so there had been no breach of the member code of conduct.

Ms X disagrees with the decision made by the monitoring officer. But there is not enough evidence of fault in how they considered Ms X’s complaint to warrant us investigating.

Ms X also complained the Council will not investigate the dispute with her neighbour. That is a civil matter and so we would not criticise the Council for taking this position.

Final decision

We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault by the Council.

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

View original on LGO (Local Governme… website

Other decisions involving Preston City Council

Reference Date Summary Outcome
25-009-181 Other
25-030-611 Other
25-008-527 27 Nov 2025 Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council dealt with an application for a Certificate of Lawfulness … Other
25-005-985 16 Sep 2025 Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s actions regarding Mrs X’s council tax account. This is because … Other
25-010-068 02 Sep 2025 Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about Council tax liability because there is a right of appeal to a … Other
View all decisions for this organisation