Source · LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman)

Runnymede Borough Council

LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman) Other Reference 24-009-543 Sector Planning Category Enforcement Decided 29 September 2024

View Runnymede Borough Council scorecard

Full decision

The Ombudsman's final decision

Summary: We cannot investigate Mr X’s complaint that the Council wrongly took court action against him for breaches of planning control. This is because we cannot investigate the start of court action or what happened at court.

The complaint

The complainant, Mr X, complains about planning enforcement action taken against him and his wife by the Council. This led to a successful prosecution and confiscation of their assets, including the eventual sale of their home. Mr X says the Council has allowed the new owner of his property to breach planning rules to an even greater extent and believes this is unfair. He wants the Council to give him back his home.

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended) The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.

We cannot investigate a complaint about the start of court action or what happened in court. (Local Government Act 1974, Schedule 5/5A, paragraph 1/3, as amended)

How I considered this complaint

I considered information provided by Mr X and the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Final decision

We cannot investigate this complaint. This is because the injustice Mr X claims stems from the court action taken by the Council against Mr X and his wife and such matters are barred from investigation as set out at Paragraph 4.

We will not separately investigate the Council’s handling of planning matters relating to the new owners of the property as the issue does not affect him. Mr X believes the treatment he received from the Council was unfair but this is not something we can consider further as set out above. We also cannot achieve the outcome Mr X wants. If Mr X wishes to challenge his conviction and the confiscation of his assets he may wish to seek legal advice.

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

View original on LGO (Local Governme… website

Other decisions involving Runnymede Borough Council

Reference Date Summary Outcome
25-018-206 Other
25-007-008 10 Sep 2025 Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council refusing to take planning enforcement action against an outbuilding, which … Other
25-005-381 02 Sep 2025 Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about damage caused to his driveway during adaptation works. This is because … Other
25-006-387 05 Aug 2025 Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the fee the Council charged for an interment. This is because … Other
25-002-713 20 Jul 2025 Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint that he has been excluded from a tenancy agreement. This is because … Other
View all decisions for this organisation