Source · LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman)

London Borough of Camden

LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman) Other Reference 24-008-705 Sector Environment And Regulation Category Trees Decided 20 October 2024

View Camden Council scorecard

Full decision

The Ombudsman's final decision

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint that the Council are responsible for damage to property while work was carried out to a nearby tree. This is because it is reasonable for the complainant to pursue their compensation claim through the courts.

The complaint

Ms X complains that her property was damaged after the Council carried out work to a nearby tree. Ms X says the Council has delayed considering her claim and responding to her complaints.

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.

The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)

How I considered this complaint

I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.

I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

My assessment

I will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because claims of liability for damage to property are better decided in the courts. It is therefore reasonable to expect Ms X to take the matter to court.

Because we are not investigating the substantive matter, an investigation solely into the Council’s handling of Mrs B’s claim and complaint is not a good use of public resources.

Final decision

We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because it is reasonable for her to pursue her claim through the courts.

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

View original on LGO (Local Governme… website

Other decisions involving London Borough of Camden

Reference Date Summary Outcome
25-016-785 Other
25-027-604 Other
25-010-268 Other
25-012-659 Other
24-021-078 Not Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation