Source · LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman)

Essex County Council

LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman) Upheld Reference 24-007-047 Sector Education Category Special Educational Needs Decided 30 October 2024

View Essex County Council scorecard

Full decision

The Ombudsman's final decision

Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about delays in producing an Education Health and Care Plan as the Council has agreed to a proportionate way to resolve the complaint.

The complaint

Mrs X complains the Council avoidably delayed in assessing and producing an Education Health and Care Plan (EHC Plan).

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word fault to refer to these. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we are satisfied with the actions a council has taken or proposes to take. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(7), as amended)

How I considered this complaint

I considered information provided by Mrs X and the Council.

I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

My assessment

Mrs X says the Council failed to assess her child’s EHC Plan needs and produce a plan within the regulations’ timescales. She says she applied in November 2023. The Council initially declined to assess her child’s needs, but in February 2024 agreed to. In the Council’s reply in July 2024 to Mrs X’s complaint, it confirmed the delay has been caused by an inability to appoint an educational psychologist.

If we were to investigate it is likely we would find fault causing the complainant injustice because the delay in completing the EHC Plan within the Regulation timescales is service failure.

Agreed action

The Council has previously set out to us its action plan to deal with the problems it has with appointing educational psychologists.

The Council has agreed to a symbolic payment of: £100 per month for the past and future injustice (uncertainty and frustration) caused by the delay outside the statutory timescale to the point of the Council taking the next action.

This is a suitable remedy for the frustration and uncertainty caused by the delay.

Final decision

We have upheld this complaint because the Council has agreed to resolve the complaint early by providing a proportionate remedy for the injustice caused to Mrs X.

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

View original on LGO (Local Governme… website

Other decisions involving Essex County Council

Reference Date Summary Outcome
25-030-610 Other
25-019-393 Other
25-005-994 Upheld
25-007-175 Upheld
25-016-209 Other
View all decisions for this organisation