Source · LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman)

Transport for London

LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman) Other Reference 24-007-021 Sector Transport And Highways Category Parking And Other Penalties Decided 13 September 2024

View Transport for London scorecard

Full decision

The Ombudsman's final decision

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about a penalty charge notice issued by Transport for London. This is because it would be reasonable for Mr X to apply to the Traffic Enforcement Centre to make a late witness statement/statutory declaration.

The complaint

The complainant, Mr X, complains about a penalty charge notice (PCN) issued by Transport for London (TfL) in December 2023. He says he made representations against the PCN but did not receive a response from TfL. TfL then instructed its enforcement agents (bailiffs) to visit his home and clamp his car. Mr X paid the bailiffs £669 to remove the clamp but he believes this is unfair and wants TfL to refund the additional charges added to his case.

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.

The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended) The Traffic Enforcement Centre (TEC) is part of Northampton County Court. It considers applications from local authorities to pursue payment of unpaid PCNs and from motorists to challenge local authorities’ pursuit of unpaid PCNs.

How I considered this complaint

I considered information provided by Mr X and the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

My assessment

Because Mr X did not receive a response to his representations he may apply to the TEC to make a late witness statement/statutory declaration. If the TEC accepts his application it may order TfL to take the process back to an earlier stage, reinstating his right of appeal and removing the basis for any additional charges.

The process of making a late witness statement/statutory declaration is relatively easy to follow and I have seen nothing to suggest it would not be reasonable for Mr X to use it. I will not therefore exercise our discretion to investigate the complaint.

Final decision

We will not investigate this complaint. This is because it would be reasonable for Mr X to apply to the TEC to make a late witness statement/statutory declaration.

Investigator’s decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

View original on LGO (Local Governme… website

Other decisions involving Transport for London

Reference Date Summary Outcome
25-013-058 Other
25-022-808 Other
25-022-027 Other
25-020-343 Other
25-028-120 Other
View all decisions for this organisation