Source · LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman)

London Borough of Enfield

LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman) Other Reference 24-005-184 Sector Environment And Regulation Category Refuse And Recycling Decided 28 August 2024

View Enfield Council scorecard

Full decision

The Ombudsman's final decision

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a Fixed Penalty Notice for fly tipping. This is because the complainant could have raised a defence in court.

The complaint

Mrs X complains the Council issued her a Fixed Penalty Notice (FPN) for fly tipping. Mrs X disputes the allegation and says she has not improperly disposed of her waste. Mrs X says the matter affected her health.

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is another body better placed to consider this complaint. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B)) We may also decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we think the issues could reasonably be, or have been, raised within a court of law. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 24A(6) and 34B(8), as amended)

How I considered this complaint

I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.

I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

My assessment

If a council thinks a person has committed an offence, it can issue the person with a Fixed Penalty Notice (FPN). If the person pays the fine, they accept liability for the offence and the matter is closed. If the person does not pay the fine, a council can take the person to court. The person can then raise a defence in court and the court will decide whether the person has committed the offence.

The Council issued Mrs X with a fixed penalty notice for fly tipping. Mrs X paid the fine, accepting liability for the offence.

We will not investigate this complaint. Mrs X paid the fine and in doing so accepted liability for the offence. If she did not agree she was liable, she could have waited for the Council to prosecute her and raised a defence in court. Only a court can determine whether someone has committed an offence. For these reasons, we will not investigate this complaint.

Final decision

We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because she could have raised a defence in court.

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

View original on LGO (Local Governme… website

Other decisions involving London Borough of Enfield

Reference Date Summary Outcome
25-003-979 Upheld
25-005-300 Other
25-017-220 Other
25-018-689 Other
25-014-960 Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation