Source · LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman)

London Borough of Enfield

LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman) Other Reference 24-005-183 Sector Benefits And Tax Category Council Tax Decided 14 August 2024

View Enfield Council scorecard

Full decision

The Ombudsman's final decision

Summary: We will not investigate this council tax complaint because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council.

The complaint

The complainant, Mr X, says the Council has not provided a breakdown of his council tax and has not explained why he has council tax arrears. Mr X wants a detailed and transparent breakdown and compensation.

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

How I considered this complaint

I considered information provided by Mr X. This includes the complaint correspondence. I also considered our Assessment Code.

My assessment

Mr X complained to the Council that it had not provided a breakdown, as requested, of his council tax and how he had accrued some arrears. In response the Council provided a breakdown, starting from 2018/19. The Council also provided breakdowns in other letters.

The Council noted some failings which included issuing two bills with contradictory information; it also said its decision to create a new account, in relation to a change relating to Mr X’s daughter, had caused some confusion and had been reversed. The Council said it had withdrawn a summons and the associated costs.

I will not investigate this complaint because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council. I have read the complaint correspondence and the Council provided detailed breakdowns regarding Mr X’s council tax. There is nothing more I would have expected the Council to say, and nothing more we could ask the Council to provide. I am not sure if Mr X is suggesting we should check the accuracy of the information but, if that is his wish, that is not our role. If Mr X thinks there are any inaccuracies in the information from the Council, he would need to contact the Council to explain what he thinks is wrong and perhaps provide supporting evidence.

There have been a few errors by the Council but these have been corrected and I have not seen anything to suggest we need to start an investigation or that the Council should pay compensation.

Final decision

We will not investigate this complaint because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council.

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

View original on LGO (Local Governme… website

Other decisions involving London Borough of Enfield

Reference Date Summary Outcome
25-003-979 Upheld
25-005-300 Other
25-017-220 Other
25-018-689 Other
25-014-960 Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation