Source · LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman)

London Borough of Tower Hamlets

LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman) Other Reference 24-003-997 Sector Transport And Highways Category Parking And Other Penalties Decided 30 July 2024

View London Borough of Tower Hamlets scorecard

Full decision

The Ombudsman's final decision

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint that the Council wrongly issued an order for recovery for a penalty charge notice that had already been cancelled. This is because the matter has been resolved and any remaining injustice caused to the complainant is not sufficient to justify our further involvement.

The complaint

Mr X complained the Council wrongly sent him an order for recovery for a penalty charge notice (PCN) that had already been cancelled. Mr X says this has caused him stress, and worry about the impact this might have on his credit rating and his application for UK citizenship.

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide any remaining injustice is not sufficient to warrant our further involvement; or further investigation would not lead to a different outcome (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

How I considered this complaint

I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.

I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

My assessment

The Council told me due to an anomaly with its PCN database, Mr X’s case was re-opened and an order for recovery was wrongly issued to him. The Council said when it learned of this, the case was manually closed.

In its response to my enquiries, the Council apologised to Mr X for any inconvenience caused and confirmed that the matter would have no impact on Mr X’s credit rating. The case is closed and the PCN cancelled; this should alleviate the concerns Mr X had about any possible impact this could have on his application for citizenship.

I do not consider therefore that there are grounds for us to investigate this complaint or that we could change the outcome of it if we did.

Final decision

We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is insufficient remaining injustice caused to him to justify our further involvement.

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

View original on LGO (Local Governme… website

Other decisions involving London Borough of Tower Hamlets

Reference Date Summary Outcome
25-012-934 Other
25-012-553 Other
25-003-968 Upheld
25-009-550 Not Upheld
25-015-480 Other
View all decisions for this organisation