Source · LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman)

London Borough of Richmond upon Thames

LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman) Other Reference 24-003-466 Sector Benefits And Tax Category Council Tax Decided 17 July 2024

View Richmond upon Thames Council scorecard

Full decision

The Ombudsman's final decision

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about an administrative error related to Mr X's council tax account. The Council has accepted fault, apologised and offered to defer the outstanding council tax owed over the next financial year. This is an appropriate remedy for the injustice caused. It is unlikely an investigation would add to this or lead to a different outcome.

The complaint

Mr X complains the Council made an administrative error in its handling of his council tax account. The Council has accepted its error, apologised to him, and offered to spread the outstanding council tax owed over the next financial year. Mr X says this is insufficient to remedy the injustice caused.

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide: we could not add to any previous investigation by the organisation, or further investigation would not lead to a different outcome.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

How I considered this complaint

I considered information provided by the complainant.

I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

My assessment

In its complaint response to Mr X, the Council accepted it had made an administrative error which meant Mr X had been unable to view his council tax bill in his online account during early 2024. It apologised to Mr X for the error. It offered to defer the outstanding amount due and spread it over the 2024/25 financial year. It also told Mr X what action it had taken to prevent the fault recurring.

We will not investigate this complaint. The Council has apologised to Mr X for the error and offered to spread the payment of the outstanding amount due. This is a proportionate remedy for any injustice caused. It is unlikely further investigation could add to this or that we would reach a different outcome.

Mr X also complains about poor complaints handling but we will also not investigate this. It is not a good use of our resources to investigate complaints about complaints handling when we are not investigating the substantive matter.

Final decision

We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because it is unlikely an investigation by us would add to the Council’s response or reach a different outcome.

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

View original on LGO (Local Governme… website

Other decisions involving London Borough of Richmond upon Thames

Reference Date Summary Outcome
25-012-512 Other
25-022-433 Other
25-021-505 Other
25-010-305 Other
25-002-750 Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation