Source · LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman)

Surrey County Council

LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman) Other Reference 24-002-202 Sector Transport And Highways Category Highway Repair And Maintenance Decided 22 May 2024

View Surrey County Council scorecard

Full decision

The Ombudsman's final decision

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about damage to Mrs X’s car tyre. This is because the complaint does not meet the tests in our Assessment Code on how we decide which complaints to investigate. It is reasonable to expect Mrs X to approach the court with her claim.

The complaint

Mrs X says driving over a pothole on a road maintained by the Council caused damage to her car tyre and she had to pay for it to be repaired. She would like the Council to reimburse her and repair the potholes.

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.

The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)

How I considered this complaint

I considered information provided by Mrs X.

I also considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

My assessment

The Council as a local highways authority has a statutory duty to maintain roads. The Council is expected to routinely monitor the state of highways and carry out repairs where necessary. But, the level of maintenance, frequency of inspection, and threshold for repair is not set out in law and is open to interpretation.

If a person considers that a highways authority has failed to properly maintain a highway it is responsible for, they can apply to a Magistrates’ court for an order to be made under section 56 of the Highways Act 1980, requiring the authority to take whatever action is needed to bring the highway up to standard.

In terms of Mrs X’s claim to cover his repair costs, we would normally expect him to pursue this via the courts. This is because it is essentially a negligence claim, and only the courts can decide if the Council is liable for any damage arising. Further, the courts would have the power to award damages against the Council. The Ombudsman has no such power to enforce an award of damages.

Final decision

We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because it is reasonable to expect her to go to court.

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

View original on LGO (Local Governme… website

Other decisions involving Surrey County Council

Reference Date Summary Outcome
25-015-766 Upheld
25-004-026 Other
25-005-021 Upheld
25-016-771 Other
25-006-993 Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation