Source · LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman)

London Borough of Haringey

LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman) Other Reference 23-021-116 Sector Adult Care Services Category Other Decided 14 May 2024

View Haringey Council scorecard

Full decision

The Ombudsman's final decision

Summary: We will not investigate Mr B’s complaint about the Council’s delay in providing him with information about access to advocacy services. This is because the Council has apologised for the oversight, explained what happened and provided Mr B with the information he requested. We could achieve no more.

The complaint

Mr B says he asked the Council to provide him with an advocate in August because the nominated contact person was not able to offer him the level of support he wanted. Mr B complained he did not receive information about advocacy services until the following March.

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

How I considered this complaint

I considered information provided by the complainant.

I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

My assessment

The Council apologised to Mr B for the delay in sending him the information he requested about accessing advocacy services. It explained it had overlooked this complaint because it receives numerous emails from Mr B and is dealing with several complaints running alongside each other at the same time. It acknowledged although Mr B was not happy with the support he received from his nominated point of contact; she had tried to help him. The Council advised Mr B of the advocacy services available to him and their contact details.

The Council explained why there was a delay in him receiving the information he requested about advocacy services and apologised. We could achieve no more even if we investigated.

Final decision

We will not investigate Mr B’s complaint because we could achieve no more even if we investigated.

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

View original on LGO (Local Governme… website

Other decisions involving London Borough of Haringey

Reference Date Summary Outcome
25-019-881 Other
25-016-827 Other
25-017-416 Other
25-015-963 Other
25-022-573 Other
View all decisions for this organisation